Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3938454

Macrodactyly.

Abstract

Digital gigantism is an unusual congenital anomaly that is present at birth or recognized in early infancy and is progressive during the period of normal skeletal maturation. It involves cell types that are predominately affected by neurogenic growth control and follow a distribution similar to the sensory supply of a major peripheral nerve, usually the median nerve. There seem to be three variants that overlap somewhat in clinical presentation. They are type I digital gigantism with lipofibromatous hamartoma of a peripheral nerve, type II digital gigantism associated with neurofibromatosis, and type III hyperostotic digital gigantism. Treatment should be individualized and initiated early in life. Epiphysiodeses, osteotomies, and division of branches of the supplying digital nerves may be indicated during childhood. In the adult, arthrodesis of the interphalangeal joints with bony shortening or ray resection may be indicated. Skin flap necrosis is a common complication postoperatively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P C Dell. 1985. Macrodactyly.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3938454/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of adverse birth outcomes associated with residence near landfill sites in Great Britain. DESIGN: Geographical study of risks of adverse birth outcomes in populations living within 2 km of 9565 landfill sites operational at some time between 1982 and 1997 (from a total of 19 196 sites) compared with those living further away. SETTING: Great Britain. SUBJECTS: Over 8.2 million live births, 43 471 stillbirths, and 124 597 congenital anomalies (including terminations). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All congenital anomalies combined, some specific anomalies, and prevalence of low and very low birth weight (<2500 g and <1500 g). RESULTS: For all anomalies combined, relative risk of residence near landfill sites (all waste types) was 0.92 (99% confidence interval 0.907 to 0.923) unadjusted, and 1.01 (1.005 to 1.023) adjusted for confounders. Adjusted risks were 1.05 (1.01 to 1.10) for neural tube defects, 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) for cardiovascular defects, 1.07 (1.04 to 1.10) for hypospadias and epispadias (with no excess of surgical correction), 1.08 (1.01 to 1.15) for abdominal wall defects, 1.19 (1.05 to 1.34) for surgical correction of gastroschisis and exomphalos, and 1.05 (1.047 to 1.055) and 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05) for low and very low birth weight respectively. There was no excess risk of stillbirth. Findings for special (hazardous) waste sites did not differ systematically from those for non-special sites. For some specific anomalies, higher risks were found in the period before opening compared with after opening of a landfill site, especially hospital admissions for abdominal wall defects. CONCLUSIONS: We found small excess risks of congenital anomalies and low and very low birth weight in populations living near landfill sites. No causal mechanisms are available to explain these findings, and alternative explanations include data artefacts and residual confounding. Further studies are needed to help differentiate between the various possibilities.

Congenital Abnormalities↗

Type IV laryngotracheoesophageal clefts -- recent 5 year experience at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children.

This article summarises a 5 year experience of type IV laryngotracheoesophageal clefts from Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London. We present six infants who had type IV clefts, two of whom are long-term survivors, and we review the literature. The recognition of specific complicating issues may lead to a standardised approach, which can result in successful repair and long-term survival. Increased awareness of the condition and early diagnosis combined with aggressive, planned surgical intervention in centres of paediatric expertise should result in a significant reduction of current mortality.

Congenital Abnormalities↗