Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3923668

rG. Potential pitfall in parentage testing.

Abstract

Extensive studies were done on the family of an infant investigated for possible hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). Fourteen members in four generations were shown to carry the rG gene with r, R1 or R2. If testing had not included anti-CD(G) serum, three false exclusions of paternity and four of maternity might have resulted in this large Caucasian family. The findings also demonstrated that titration of Rh antisera against the red cells of family members could not be relied upon to assess zygosity or dosage.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Schornack, K M Beattie. rG. Potential pitfall in parentage testing.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1985.25385219913.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

JAHK: a low frequency antigen associated with the rG complex of the Rh blood group system.

We have investigated a 'new' low frequency antigen JAHK, which is a marker for the rare Rh gene complex rG. The rG haplotype does not produce any D, c or E antigens, but does produce a strong G antigen. The rG haplotype [d(C)(e)G] is associated with weak C and weak e antigens. Three unrelated rG/dce individuals and one rG/rG propositus were JAHK+. In addition, three propositi whose red cells had a typical expression of C and/or e antigen, which could not be shown to be rG because of a normal D antigen produced by the haplotype in trans, were also JAHK+. Families of three of the propositi demonstrate the inheritance of JAHK as a Mendelian dominant character. It is likely that the JAHK antigen results from conformational changes in an RhCcEe protein that has the amino acid characteristic of c antigen at position 16 and the amino acid residues characteristic of C antigen at positions 60, 68, and 103. JAHK has been assigned the number RH53.

Blood Grouping and Crossmatching↗

RHCE-D-CE hybrid genes can cause false-negative DNA typing of the Rh e antigen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: DNA typing of the human Rh blood groups generally shows good agreement with serologically defined phenotypes. However, in the present report we describe four individuals who were declared Rh e negative by genotyping although they express the Rh e antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serotyping was performed using mono- and polyclonal Rh antisera. Fluorescent multiplex sequence-specific polymerase chain reactions (PCR-SSPs) identified RHD exons and the polymorphisms usually associated with the Rh E/e or Rh C/c/C(W) antigens. Additional PCR amplification reactions, which were carried out to reveal RHCE-D-CE hybrid genes, analysed exon 5 of the RH genes, the location of the polymorphism (676C-->G) coding for the Rh E and Rh e antigens. RESULTS: Four individuals were identified who expressed Rh e antigens but were negative by PCR-SSP typing for common Rhe-coding sequences. In one family analysed in detail, an RHCE-D5-CE hybrid gene associated with Rh e antigen expression was identified. A concomitant RHcE allele accounted for a seemingly regular typing pattern by conventional RH PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of RHCE-D5-CE hybrid alleles may cause false-negative DNA-typing results for the Rh e antigen that are easily overlooked unless appropriate RH hybrid PCR-SSPs are incorporated into conventional DNA-typing protocols. These and previous data strongly caution against an uncritical interpretation of RH DNA-typing results.

Blood Grouping and Crossmatching↗