Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3912452

Evaluating RECONSIDER. A computer program for diagnostic prompting.

S J Nelson·M S Blois·M S Tuttle·M Erlbaum·P Harrison·H Kim·B Winkelmann·D Yamashita
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

RECONSIDER, a computer program designed to perform as a diagnostic prompting aid, was evaluated for its ability to include the correct diagnosis in an ordered computed list of candidate diseases. The study was performed using 100 consecutive first admissions to the medical service of a university hospital, where the individuals entering the data into the program were blind to all but a limited set of findings known at time of admission. Each person entering the data created one or more lists of diagnostic possibilities (versions) using the program. The program suggested the correct diagnosis within the first 40 on its list 61% (498/797) of the time; the correct diagnosis was present with the first 40 in at least one version 93% (98/105) of the time. Performance was found to be best with cases having a single diagnosis and when more terms were entered into the program.

Explore related subjects

ComputersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ErrorsEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansSoftwareJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Nelson, M S Blois, M S Tuttle, M Erlbaum, P Harrison, H Kim, B Winkelmann, D Yamashita. 1985. Evaluating RECONSIDER. A computer program for diagnostic prompting.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992575

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

[Computerized physician order entry, a tool for added safety in the hospital].

DRUG-RELATED IATROGENIC NOSOCOMIAL ILLNESS: Remains a matter of concern in the public health area. Responsibility of hospitals is challenged by the ever increasing number of patients' claims. Dysfunction in the drug-prescribing and delivery system account, to a large extent, for medication errors, some of them resulting in adverse drug events. Most generally, medication ordering by the physician is handwritten, without nominative recapitulating prescriptions, and followed by nurse transcriptions and a global medication order is transmitted to the pharmacy. This system does not integrate the pharmaceutical analysis of the prescription, before distribution of the drugs. THE COMPUTERIZED DRUG ORDER ENTRY PROCESS: The prescription is entered directly and is displayed on the computer screen, together with the previous prescriptions for the same patient. Transcription is hence eliminated. Depending on the sophistication of the software, the prescription undergoes a series of tests; warnings and reminders can be displayed online before the physician validates the prescription. Moreover, various guidelines in some aspects of drug therapy may be presented online before the prescription is completed. POSSIBILITIES: The pharmacist's access to the complete prescriptions permits analysis of the quality and safety of the prescriptions and the adequation with eventual current applicable recommendations. Prospective drug utilization review, with immediate feedback to the prescribing physician in case of concern, may be undertaken, further improving the quality of drug therapy. Moreover, a work sheet is printed out for the nurses, further enhancing the safety of drug administration and validation. The computerized drug network also permits the development of other functions. A TOOL FOR SAFETY: Currently available reports in the literature suggest that computerized drug prescription reduces the incidence of prescribing errors, improves the appropriateness of drug choices, optimises therapeutic follow-up, and reduces the incidence adverse drug events and leads to substantial reduction in drug expenditures.

Computers↗