Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3906720

Traumatic hemipelvectomy.

Abstract

This is a report of a patient who sustained a traumatic avulsion of the hemipelvis and survived this catastrophic challenge. Survival of the patient is dependent on multiple factors of associated injuries, early management, and general health of the patient. Early involvement of the plastic surgical team offers a coordinating influence that can provide the maximum of efficiency for early care and subsequent reconstruction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F J Danisi, B V Stromberg. 1985. Traumatic hemipelvectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198512000-00030

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Early diagnosis of cerebral fat embolism syndrome by diffusion-weighted MRI (starfield pattern).

BACKGROUND: Cerebral fat embolism syndrome is a rare, but potentially lethal, complication of long bone fractures. Neurological symptoms are variable, and the clinical diagnosis is difficult. The purpose of this case study is to demonstrate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI of the brain for early diagnosis of fat embolism syndrome. Case Description- A non-head-injured 18-year-old woman suffered acute mental status changes 21 hours after an uncomplicated fracture of the left tibia. MRI of the brain was performed 48 hours after injury. T2-weighted images showed multiple nonconfluent areas of high signal intensity, which, on the diffusion-weighted scans, were revealed as bright spots on a dark background ("starfield" pattern). We suggest that this indicates areas of restricted diffusion that are due to cytotoxic edema, resulting from multiple microemboli. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity lesions in the brain on diffusion-weighted images may serve as an early-appearing and more sensitive indicator of the diagnosis of fat embolism in the clinical context of long bone injury without head trauma.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Individual state driving restrictions for people with epilepsy in the US.

BACKGROUND: States in the United States vary widely in their approaches to restricting driving for patients with epilepsy. Many states have shortened seizure-free restrictions or have adopted flexible regulations that consider individual clinical factors in determining driving privileges. The authors summarized state driving restrictions for patients with seizures, particularly unpublished regulatory practices, and determined the role and liability of physicians in judging driving safety for patients with epilepsy. METHODS: The authors surveyed motor vehicle administration bureaus in the 50 states and the District of Columbia and compared the laws, regulations, and practices restricting driving for people with epilepsy. Key responses from a questionnaire were confirmed by state motor vehicle administrations with phone interviews and by a signed executive summary. RESULTS: Twenty-eight states, including the District of Columbia, have laws requiring patients with epilepsy to be free of seizures for single fixed periods, with a median restriction of six months (range, 3 to 12 months). Twenty-three states have adopted more flexible approaches to restricting driving, such as varying seizure-free restrictions based on individual clinical factors. Many states allow patients to drive after shorter seizure-free periods than stated in their laws. These practices, however, are usually unpublished and not easily accessible. Physicians helped determine when their patients may drive in 13 states and were not legally shielded for their assessments in six of these states. CONCLUSIONS: States vary widely in how they regulate driving for patients with seizures. These varied regulatory approaches present potentially valuable models to determine how driving might be best regulated to protect public and patient safety optimally while permitting patients with controlled seizures to drive.

Accidents, Traffic↗