PubMed · 3906563
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C A Romano. 1985. Implementing computer technology in nursing education.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3906563/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The independence of teachers and students is one of the main advantages of teleteaching. Specialties considered unsuitable for combined lessons are manageable using the internet. This study outlines simultaneous communication with students and lecturers over long distances between the anatomical dissection laboratory, the operating theatre, and the lecture hall. In several three-directional on-line lectures, different equipment was used. Students could also participate using personal computers from other locations. During the presentations, the participants have the opportunity to discuss problems with any lecturer. It was possible to demonstrate sufficient transmission capability for real-time application with the use of the new internet technology. No important qualitative differences can be reported between: hardware and software based solutions; or commercial and free offers. Although it is often difficult to reconcile the timetable of surgeries and lectures, multimedia on-line teaching via the internet provides new potential for interdisciplinary medical education.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the performance in learning clinical research methodology (CRM) by means of the Keller Plan (KP), to assess its impact on attitudes towards research (AR) and to estimate its acceptability. DESIGN: An educational intervention trial was employed with control group (CG) and random assignment. SETTING: The Family and Community Medicine Teaching Unit in Valencia, Spain, 1997. SUBJECTS: Third-year family residents. RESULTS: In the KP both specific written self-teaching material and interactive computer programme were used, focusing on the tutored resident, with compulsory assessments to continue. In the CG a conventional course was followed. Knowledge of CRM and the AR test (previously validated in another study) were measured at the start. Four tests of successive knowledge, time spent studying, tutorials, final AR test and acceptability were conducted. Non-parametric tests were used. Forty (89%) residents participated, 22 were assigned to KP and 18 to CG. Similar basic characteristics, with exception of AR test (medians 55 Keller, 58 control). KP knowledge tests significantly higher (P = < 0.05) than the CG (medians 101, 88) along with time spent studying (medians 53, 23.4 h). There were no significant differences in AR test, although there was an improvement in both groups, significant in KP but not in CG (median increase of 4.5 and 2). Nine residents used and positively assessed the computer programme. Better acceptability was obtained by the KP in overall evaluation, recommendation of the method and learning dynamic. CONCLUSIONS: The KP obtained better knowledge, motivated studying and was positively accepted.
Conducting a hospital-based radiation safety training class may lead to temporary technologist staffing shortages resulting in a reduction of patient services or even the cessation of all routine patient services. Use of an interactive computer-based radiation safety training software program may provide a practical alternative for hospital diagnostic and therapeutic radiation departments, as well as other hospital departments utilizing radiation sources, in meeting annual radiation safety training requirements for radiation workers. Medical radiation workers' participation in computer-based radiation safety training can make a positive impact on radiation safety awareness in the hospital, assist license holders in satisfying regulatory training requirements, ensure maximum participation of staff technologists, and reduce the burden of technologist staffing shortages caused by traditional methods of training.