Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3898641

[A cast framework for a missing incisor].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Novak, R Sedej. 1985. [A cast framework for a missing incisor].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3898641/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Interfacial failure of a dental cement composite bonded to glass substrates.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the interfacial fracture toughness and investigate failure mechanisms of dental cements bound to soda-lime glasses elastically equivalent to dental ceramics, as loading angle changes from 0 to 20 degrees . METHODS: Two half-circle glass discs received surface treatment were bound using dental cement (3M RelyXTM ARC BLBL) to make Brazil-nut sandwich specimens for interfacial toughness testing. Before bonding the two half-circle glass disks, 8% hydrofluoric acid (HF) was applied on the surfaces to bond for 2 min, washed thoroughly for 1 min under tap water and air dried. The surfaces were further treated using silane primer Monobond-s (Vivadent, Liechtenstein) for 60s and air dried. Interfacial toughness as a function of mode mixity was measured using an Instron testing machine by changing loading angels from 0 to 20 degrees . The interfacial fracture surfaces were examined using SEM and EDX to determine the failure modes when loading angles change. RESULTS: Interfacial toughness increases from approximately 1 to 8 J/m/m when loading angle increases from 0 to approximately 20 degrees . Increasing deformation and fracture in dental cement occur when loading angle increases. SIGNIFICANCES: Increasing interfacial toughness can be attributed to more deformation and fracture of dental cement when loading angle increases. Brazil-nut sandwich samples are shown to provide a promising alternative method to evaluate bond strength and interfacial failure for dental restoration. Research was supported by NIH (NYU/PHS No. F5262-07).

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Effect of surface pre-treatment on durability of resin-based cements bonded to titanium.

OBJECTIVES: Titanium has in recent years become a material of great opportunities in dentistry and orthopedics. In this study, we searched for a method to effectively pre-treat titanium as part of an adhesive luting and/or resin-veneering procedure. METHODS: Ti plates were treated with two different solutions of hydrochloric acid (0.1, 1N), 37wt% phosphoric acid or kept untreated (control). The tensile bond strength of the composite cement (Panavia Fluoro Cement, Kuraray) to the untreated and pre-treated Ti plates was determined without and after 20,000 thermo-cycles. XPS was used to chemically analyze the effect of the three Ti pre-treatments, as well as the interaction of 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP; functional monomer of Panavia Fluoro Cement) with Ti treated with 1N HCl. RESULTS: Although no significant difference in immediate tensile bond strength was measured, thermo-cycling significantly decreased the bond strength of all experimental groups except for Ti treated with 1N HCl. No difference in surface roughness was found between untreated and treated Ti. XPS demonstrated that HCl effectively decontaminated Ti in a dose-dependent manner, while H(3)PO(4) was strongly adsorbed on the Ti surface. While the latter potentially inhibits adsorption of the phosphoric groups of the functional monomer 10-MDP, Ti pre-treated with 1N HCl improved the adsorption of 10-MDP as compared to untreated Ti. SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that 1N HCl effectively pre-treats Ti in order to make it more receptive to resin, while H(3)PO(4) should better not be used.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

An investigation into the bonding of orthodontic attachments to porcelain.

This study assessed bonding of orthodontic brackets to porcelain teeth using two different surface preparation techniques and comparing two bonding systems, Fuji Ortho L.C. and Transbond. Four groups of 20 porcelain premolar teeth were bonded with metal orthodontic brackets (0.022 inch Minitwin, 3M Unitek) according to the following protocol: Transbond with a phosphoric acid etch (group 1), Transbond with a hydrofluoric acid etch (group 2), Fuji Ortho L.C. with a hydrofluoric acid etch (group 3), and Fuji Ortho L.C. with a phosphoric acid etch (group 4). All groups were bonded with a silane coupling agent. The teeth were debonded with an Instron universal testing machine. Bond strength, site of bond failure and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were recorded for each group. Differences between groups were analysed statistically. The composite resin groups (groups 1 and 2) had the highest mean bond strength values at 7.9 and 9.7 MPa, respectively. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement groups (RMGIC; groups 3 and 4) had the lowest mean bond strength values at 6.3 and 1.8 MPa, respectively. The mean bond strength of group 3 was significantly lower than all other groups (P < 0.0001). The Fuji groups had also significantly (P < 0.001) lower ARI scores than the composite groups (groups 1 and 2). Most samples experienced porcelain surface damage, except group 4. In conclusion, the highest bond strength levels were achieved with a conventional composite resin cement (groups 1 and 2). No significant differences in bond strength were found between the hydrofluoric and phosphoric acid etch technique.

Acid Etching, Dental↗