Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3893847

Mandibular reconstruction.

Abstract

Although there is no general agreement, we think immediate reconstruction with free bone graft from the iliac crest or rib is the method of choice for a small mandibular body or arch defect without concomitant significant loss of soft tissue. Soft tissue reconstruction with well-vascularized tissue should always be performed when extensive loss of soft tissue occurs after hemimandibulectomy to avoid tension on the stump and mandibular drift. When postoperative radiation is not anticipated, immediate bone grafting is appropriate. A free bone covered by well-vascularized tissue or a composite graft is our primary choice, but alloplastic trays with cancellous bone can also be considered. If postoperative radiation is anticipated, only soft tissue repair should be performed and osseous reconstruction should be deferred until radiotherapy is completed. Defects of the arch require special attention because of the severe deviation of the mandibular stumps. Immediate reconstruction is recommended in uncomplicated cases, but secondary bone grafting will be needed when the patient is in poor condition, or postoperative radiation places the bone graft in jeopardy. In such cases, immediate stabilization of the bone segments by internal or external fixation is absolutely necessary. Finally, secondary reconstruction should be considered only if there is no evidence of residual tumor. The defect should be recreated, scarred or irradiated tissue resected, and immediate reconstruction obtained with well-vascularized pedicled or free flaps.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Cohen, R C Schultz. 1985. Mandibular reconstruction.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3893847/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a comparative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term outcomes after laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion (ASF) for cervical myelopathy secondary to disc herniation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been no reports of long-term comparative studies of laminoplasty and ASF for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation. METHODS: Of 21 patients who underwent ASF only between 1984 and 1987, 15 were followed up. Of 22 patients who underwent laminoplasty only between 1987 and 1994, 18 were followed up. There were no significant differences in preoperative prognostic factors between the 2 groups. Average follow-up was 15 years in the ASF group and 10 years in the laminoplasty group. Neurologic and radiologic results were examined. RESULTS: Laminoplasty and ASF provided equal neurologic improvement. In the ASF group, additional surgery was required for bone graft complications in 2 patients and for adjacent spondylosis in 1. In the laminoplasty group, one patient had C5 palsy, and intractable axial pain developed in 5 patients after surgery, but no patients needed additional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Because the 2 procedures provided the same neurologic improvement, the risks of bone graft complication with ASF must be weighed against the risks of chronic neck pain associated with laminoplasty for determining the best technique. Therefore, because our present surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation, laminoplasty is the procedure of choice except for a patient with single level disc herniation without developmental canal stenosis, who is considered to be a good candidate for ASF.

Bone Transplantation↗

Improved brain protection at decompressive craniectomy--a new method using Palacos R-40 (methylmethacrylate).

A new method is described for protecting the brain after decompressive craniectomy in which a temporary methylmethacrylate flap is formed, somewhat larger than the original bone flap, thus gaining "extra" volume for the oedematous brain in which to expand. The present procedure was developed as a part of ordinary clinical practice particularly in response to demands from the NICU staff and our colleagues at other clinics who were responsible for the care of the patient in the post NICU period. They made us keenly aware that these patients frequently lack optimal co-ordination and balance and therefore run an increased risk of trauma to the unprotected brain when falling. This prompted us to develop a method for brain protection after decompressive craniectomy aiding in the care and rehabilitation until the final installation of the patient's own bone flap can be performed.

Bone Transplantation↗

[Autologous rib graft for restoration of continuity defects of the mandible].

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor resection in infants is a particular challenge. Although autologous rib grafts have no relevance nowadays for restoration of mandibular bone defects following ablative tumor surgery due to limited bone stock and the availability of other donor areas, they are a useful surgical alternative following tumor surgery in infants. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We here report on the 5- and 10-year follow-up of two children who were diagnosed with benign tumors of the mandible with osseous destruction at the age of 4 and 6 months, respectively. Histological diagnoses were melanotic neuroectodermal tumor and hemangioendothelioma of the mandible. Following continuity resection of the mandible lateral mandibular bone defects were restored using autologous rib grafts. Yearly clinical and radiological follow-up visits in both children were performed to assess growth of the facial skeleton as well as mandibular growth. RESULT: Cephalometric measurements on panorex films as well as 3D CT scans revealed slight vertical growth excess and transversal growth inhibition of the reconstructed mandible in comparison with the non-operated side. DISCUSSION: Although further growth of rib grafts is difficult to predict and occlusal disharmony may occur due to physiologic maxillary growth and growth of the unaffected mandible, we believe that autologous rib grafts can be ideally used for restoration of mandibular continuity defects in newborns. Clinical follow-up visits on a yearly basis and orthodontic controls are useful for early orthodontic treatment of growth deficits. Further corrective surgery with bone augmentation or osseous distraction is required following completion of growth of the facial skeleton.

Bone Transplantation↗