PubMed · 3888693
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H Weber. 1985. [Instruments, materials, and processing technics. What is new?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3888693/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
UNLABELLED: Electron beam irradiation can be used to influence the properties of polymers. It was the aim of this study to investigate whether PMMA denture base materials can benefit from irradiation in order to have increased fracture toughness, work of fracture or hardness. Rectangular specimens of heat-and auto-curing denture base materials were electron beam irradiated (post-cured) with 25, 100 and 200 kGy using an electron acceleration of 10 MeV or 4.5 MeV respectively. Fracture toughness, work of fracture, Vickers hardness and colour changes were measured and compared with not-irradiated specimens. The toughness, work of fracture and hardness increased using 10 MeV with a dose of 25 kGy and with 100 kGy using 4.5 MeV. However, the clinical use may not benefit from the observed small changes. Higher dosage (200 kGy) decreased the values significantly. The colour changes reached a level which was found to be not clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION: PMMA denture base materials do not benefit from post-curing with electron beam irradiation.
OBJECTIVES: Since the introduction of poly(methyl methacrylate) as a denture base material, it has suffered from having relatively poor mechanical properties. Many methods of improving its strength and toughness have been investigated. Most of these have not been adopted due to: increased cost, the need for specialist processing equipment or increased laboratory time due to more complicated procedures. Glass flake has been used as a reinforcing agent in many industrial polymers, but is as yet untested with denture base acrylic materials. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding glass flake to denture base acrylic powder on the fracture toughness of the set material. METHODS: Glass flake was added in 5, 10 or 20% w/w to Trevalon denture base powder. The material was mixed, flasked, packed and processed in a manner typical for a denture base material. Fracture toughness was determined using a double torsion test technique. RESULTS: The addition of glass flake gave up to a 69% increase in fracture toughness compared to plain Trevalon material. The addition of 5% glass flake lead to an improvement in fracture toughness that was statistically significant compared to both plain Trevalon and the 10 and 20% groups. SIGNIFICANCE: The significant improvement in fracture toughness of a denture base acrylic material using glass flake is an extremely promising result. Other mechanical properties will require testing before glass flake can be recommended as a reinforcing agent for denture base acrylic materials.
BACKGROUND: Allergies to natural rubber latex (NRL) were unknown in dentistry until 1987. That changed with the publication of a report documenting NRL-based anaphylaxis in a dental worker. This case and others prompted regulatory and manufacturing changes in rubber products and increased awareness throughout the profession. However, other common dental chemicals cause allergic reactions and irritation and often are handled with insufficient precautions. Although recognition of NRL allergy has improved, awareness of other potential allergens and irritants in dentistry still is limited. OVERVIEW: Recent research indicates that the prevalence of NRL protein allergy may be decreasing. In contrast, occupation-related dermatoses associated with other dental products may be more common. Encounters with bonding agents, disinfectants, rubber, metals and detergents can cause occupation-based irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. These conditions may be found in more than one-quarter of dental and medical personnel. Therefore, dental-specific information about the recognition and management of allergic and irritant reactions is needed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The prevalence of occupation-related dermatitis may be increasing in dentistry. Reducing exposure to potential irritants and allergens and educating personnel about proper skin care are essential to reversing this trend.