Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 385087

Residency selection process: description and annotated bibliography.

Abstract

Specialty and residency training choices of medical students will affect the quality, mode, and geographic location of their future practice; the importance of such choices should not be underestimated. Medical school librarians have largely ignored the opportunity to interact with both medical students and medical school officials in providing sources needed to assist these career decisions, and for the most part students and administrators have ignored the opportunity to utilize the medical library in this process. This article presents an overview of the processes and procedures in which third- and fourth-year medical students are involved in selecting specialty and residency training, and provides a detailed description of the resources which the medical student should consult in order to make thoughtful, informed career decisions. The article urges medical school advisers and medical librarians to work as partners in providing information on specialty and residency selection to medical students.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P R Aaron, T L Frye. 1979. Residency selection process: description and annotated bibliography.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/385087/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mental health parity: a review of research and a bibliography.

This article summarizes the content of a meeting held in July 2001 to (1) review what is known about the effect of parity based on research already done, (2) identify what is likely to be known from research in progress, and (3) identify the knowledge gaps that still exist. An annotated bibliography of studies and reports on parity from 1996 through 2001 is included.

Bibliographies as Topic↗

A review of the accuracy of references in the journal Emergency Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of references in articles published in Emergency Medicine, and to categorize these errors. METHODS: All the references in Volume 12 of Emergency Medicine were listed and numbered consecutively. A sample of 100 references was then selected. Each reference was then checked, initially on an electronic database, with the original article being used as the gold standard. RESULTS: 1469 citations were included in the study. A random sample of 100 was taken and examined in detail. 35 papers were shown to have at least one error, and a total of 41 errors were found. The maximum number of errors in one paper was 3. These errors are analysed in detail. CONCLUSION: Poor reference accuracy is a common problem in medical literature, and Emergency Medicine is not immune to these failings. Authors need to take more care to ensure that the accuracy of citations improves.

Bibliographies as Topic↗