Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3842871

Selecting mating pairs with linear programming techniques.

Abstract

Mate selection can increase progency merit if overall merit is nonlinear for one or more component traits. An index of expected progeny merit could be calculated for all possible mating pairs, and the set of pairs with the highest progeny mean could be selected. There are serious computational problems for more than a few males and females. To select and mate f, females, and m, males, from n of each, with k0 females per male, would require (nf)(nm)f!/(k0!)m evaluations. Linear programming algorithms can determine the optimal strategy efficiently by considering only a subset of these possibilities. Let pi ij be the index of progency merit of the ith sire mated to the jth dam and Xij be the decision variable for that mating (restricted to 0 or 1). Then the problem of selecting mating pairs can be stated as: maximize sigma i sigma j pi ij Xij, subject to sigma i Xij less than or equal to 1, sigma j Xij less than or equal to k0, sigma i sigma j Xij = f, and Xij = 0 or 1. By including an artificial sire and an artificial dam and choosing appropriate merit values for the artificial matings, this problem can be solved by efficient "transportation" algorithms. These algorithms could be used to develop rational mating packages for dairy artificial insemination studs provided that an objective evaluation of progeny merit could be formulated, provided that merit is not simply additively inherited.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G B Jansen, J W Wilton. 1985. Selecting mating pairs with linear programming techniques.. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)80961-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds.

In late 2005, sporadic cases of an acute onset disease of high mortality were observed in 10- to 16-week-old growing pigs among several swine herds of the United States. Tissues from the affected pigs in Kansas, Iowa, and North Carolina were examined, and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was detected consistently among these tissues. Phylogenetically, PCV2 can be divided into two major genotypic groups, PCV2-group 1 and PCV2-group 2. Whereas PCV2-group 1 isolates were detected in all the diseased animals, only two of the diseased animals harbored PCV2-group 2 isolates. This observation is important because PCV2-group 1 isolates had never been reported in the United States before (GenBank as of May 16, 2006), and they are closely related to the PCV2-group 1 isolates that have been described in Europe and Asia, previously. Our analysis revealed that each genotypic group contains a distinct stretch of nucleotide or amino acid sequence that may serve as a signature motif for PCV2-group 1 or PCV2-group 2 isolates.

Animal Husbandry↗

Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.

The effects of gestation housing systems on sow and litter performance were evaluated for 2.5 yr in southwest Iowa. Gestation housing system treatments were as follows: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with a partially slatted floor and a manure flush system and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns. In all, 957 litters from 353 sows were evaluated. Number of pigs born alive per litter differed for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.002). Sows gestated in hoop barns gave birth to more live pigs per litter (10.0 +/- 0.2 pigs) than sows gestated in stalls (9.3 +/- 0.2 pigs). Preweaning mortality was not different for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.70). Cross-fostering was done to equalize litter size within 24 h of birth, which resulted in an equal number of weaned pigs per sow (P = 0.50) regardless of gestation housing treatment. The weaning-to-breeding interval was different (P = 0.01), with sows kept in stalls (4.3 +/- 0.6 d) returning to estrus sooner than sows gestated in hoop barns (6.0 +/- 0.6 d). These results indicate that gestating sows can be housed as groups in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and will perform comparably to gestating sows housed in confinement systems with individual gestation stalls.

Animal Husbandry↗