Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3837272

Constructing an efficient inpatient incident reporting system.

Abstract

The NYS Office of Mental Health invests significant staff resources in documenting, investigating, and reviewing minor incidents. This process generates an enormous amount of paperwork. A study by the NYS Commission on Quality of Care revealed that this investment, in fact, compromised the intended positive outcomes. A major flaw they cited was the requirement for identical reporting procedures for both major and minor incidents. A logging system for reporting minor incidents was developed and pilot tested in three OMH psychiatric hospitals. The study revealed that utilization of a log system for the reporting of minor incidents greatly reduced paperwork and staff time, and that these reductions were accomplished without detriment to the quality of care. In fact, the quality of patient care may have improved. More incidents were being reported, a stable record was available on wards for clinical review, staff were enthusiastic about the log system, perhaps improving their morale, and direct care staff had more time available to spend with patients. This type of logging system for the reporting of minor incidents would appear applicable to practically all inpatient psychiatric settings, and, if employed as intended, could be expected to contribute to an improved quality of patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B B Way, J Braff, H J Steadman. 1985. Constructing an efficient inpatient incident reporting system.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01064334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety.

This study, through a random national survey, explored how senior financial executives or managers (those who determined high-level budget, resource allocation, and corporate priorities) of medium-to-large companies perceive important workplace safety issues. The three top-rated safety priorities in resource allocation reported by the participants (overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily reaction) were consistent with the top three perceived causes of workers' compensation losses. The greatest single safety concerns reported were overexertion, repetitive motion, highway accidents, falling on the same level and bodily reaction. A majority of participants believed that the indirect costs associated with workplace injury were higher than the direct costs. Our participants believed that money spent improving workplace safety would have significant returns. The perceived top benefits of an effective workplace safety program were increased productivity, reduced cost, retention, and increased satisfaction among employees. The perceived most important safety modification was safety training. The top reasons senior financial executives gave for believing their safety programs were better than those at other companies were that their companies paid more attention to and emphasized safety, they had better classes and training focused on safety, and they had teams/individuals focused specifically on safety.

Accident Prevention↗