PubMed · 3804669
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M G Kienzle. 1986. Amiodarone.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3804669/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: The most effective and safest antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF is unknown. METHODS: The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study compared two treatment strategies--rate control and rhythm control--in patients with AF and risk factors for stroke or death. This substudy, performed in patients randomized to rhythm control, compared different antiarrhythmic drugs by randomly assigning the first drug treatment to: 1) amiodarone, 2) sotalol, or 3) a class I drug. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive, in sinus rhythm, with no additional cardioversions and still taking the assigned drug at one year. Comparisons were made between patients eligible for each of three drug pairs. RESULTS: At one year, in 222 patients randomized between amiodarone and class I agents, 62% were successfully treated with amiodarone, compared with 23% taking class I agents (p < 0.001). In 256 patients randomized between amiodarone and sotalol, 60% versus 38% were successfully treated, respectively (p = 0.002). In 183 patients randomized between sotalol and class I agents, 34% versus 23% were successfully treated, respectively (p = 0.488), although this portion of the substudy was stopped early when amiodarone was shown to be better than class I agents. Sinus rhythm was achieved in nearly 80% of patients at one-year follow-up with serial therapy. Adverse effects were common. CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone was more effective at one year than either sotalol or class I agents for the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm without cardioversion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Amiodarone, a promising drug for the treatment of tachyarrythmias, was recently found to have immunomodulatory effects in vitro. We hypothesized that amiodarone would affect the immune system in vivo and examined the effect of amiodarone on myocarditis in rats. We induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats by cardiac myosin immunization and treated the animals with an intraperitoneal injection of amiodarone at 25 mg/kg/every other day, 10 times after the induction of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. In the treated group, both microscopic and macroscopic examinations showed reduced heart weights, a mild and localized infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis in the myocardium, and a mild congestion in the liver and lungs as compared with the control group. The phenotypic distribution of lymphocytes in peripheral blood showed a significant decrease in the CD4/CD8a ratio in the treated group, but not in the control group. The proportion of mast cells involved in inflammatory cell infiltration was lower in the treated group than the control group. In vitro, amiodarone inhibited the proliferation of mast cells by arresting them in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. These results indicated that amiodarone minimized the progression of experimental autoimmune myocarditis, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for amiodarone treatment in patients suffering from myocarditis, especially myocarditis complicated by cardiac arrhythmias. One possible mechanism by which amiodarone minimizes the progression of experimental autoimmune myocarditis may be to affect the immune system via the immunomodulatory effects on T cell and mast cell functions.