Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3774144

Hemispheric differences for feature detection.

Abstract

The role of hemispheric processing for visual features was explored by tachistoscopically presenting subjects with stimulus displays composed of the letter I, displays in which a single T was embedded in an array of I's, or displays in which the letter O was embedded in an array of I's. The number of array elements was also manipulated (4, 16, or 36) to assess the effects of display size on featural detection for each visual field. Subjects verbally indicated whether array elements were all the same, or whether a T or O was present. Hemispheric error rates varied as a function of the type of letter to be detected, with left-hemisphere presentations producing superior performance for the detection of T's, right-hemisphere presentations yielding superior performance for the detection of O's, and Same displays demonstrating hemispheric patterns consistent with these results. The findings suggest that the analysis of perceptual features during visual stimulus processing may determine hemispheric outcomes in a variety of task situations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Polich, W H Lentz, D L Crossman. 1986. Hemispheric differences for feature detection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90104-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Mirror movements. Preliminary therapeutic study].

BACKGROUND: Mirror movements are a specific type of synkinesis. The pathogenesis is unknown. Three types have been identified: 1) a hereditary form, 2) a form associated with other neurological diseases, 3) a sporadic form, as is this case. CASE REPORT: A girl was born at term after cesarean section for fetal anoxia. Psychomotor development seemed normal, but mirror movements of fingers, hands, wrists and forearms were noticed when she was 8-9 months old. There were no other neurological manifestations and the imaging techniques were normal. Rehabilitation was begun when she was 20 months old. The girl is now 4 1/2 years old and writes, draws and cuts up normally. CONCLUSIONS: Mirror movements that are not associated with other neurological disorders usually remain unchanged and can be a professional handicap for adults. Prolonged rehabilitation offers a good functional prognosis.

Dominance, Cerebral