PubMed · 3748922
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D H Schweyen. 1986-09-01. Anticoagulation therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3748922/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Two hundred twenty-eight patients with successful coronary stent implantation were randomized either to protamine administration and femoral sheath removal (group I, n = 117) or no heparin neutralization and delayed sheath removal (group II, n = 111). The hospital stay after treatment was shorter in patients receiving protamine; therefore, protamine use for neutralizing circulating heparin may be safely administered immediately after stent implantation.
BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials of venous thromboembolism treatment suggest inadequate initial heparin therapy predisposes patients to late recurrence of thromboembolism. However, a recent review article was unable to demonstrate a relationship between initial heparin therapy and late recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between initial heparin treatment and long-term clinical outcome in 3 consecutive, randomized, double-blind trials that used similar study designs and patient populations and objective documentation of recurrent venous thromboembolism. METHODS: The trials were performed sequentially and compared the use of continuous intravenous with subcutaneous heparin, continuous intravenous heparin for 10 or 5 days, and continuous intravenous heparin with once-daily subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. All patients were followed up for 3 months to assess the a priori hypothesis that inadequate initial heparin therapy could lead to recurrent venous thromboembolism during long-term therapy with warfarin sodium. RESULTS: The following were the observed rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism: continuous intravenous heparin, 3 (5.2%) of 58 patients vs subcutaneous heparin, 11 (19.3%) of 57 patients; continuous intravenous heparin for 10 days, 7 (7.0%) of 100 patients or for 5 days, 7 (7.1%) of 99 patients; and continuous intravenous heparin, 15 (6.9%) of 219 patients vs low-molecular-weight heparin, 6 (2.8%) of 213 patients. Pooled analysis of the patients treated with continuous intravenous heparin showed that of the total 32 patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism, in 6 patients thromboembolism occurred early (< 10 days) and 26 patients thromboembolism occurred late. Of these patients, the majority (20/32 [62.5%]) had therapeutic prothrombin time or international normalized ratio values before or at the time of the recurrent thromboembolic event. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that the initial heparin treatment affects the long-term outcome. This conclusion applies when these data are analyzed for each individual study by treatment group, observed difference in outcome, and pooled analysis.
Enantiomers of warfarin and 7-hydroxywarfarin in human plasma and urine, respectively, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography using a cellulose-derivative column with UV or fluorescent detection, and their absolute configuration was determined simultaneously by a circular dichroism spectropolarimeter connected in series. Enantiomers of warfarin and its major metabolites [i.e., (R)-6-hydroxywarfarin, (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin and (RS)-warfarin alcohol] were well resolved. The method was precise and sensitive: within- and between-day coefficients of variation were <9.6% for warfarin enantiomers in plasma and <7.1% for 7-hydroxywarfarin enantiomers in urine, respectively, and the lower detection limits were 20 ng/ml for (R)-warfarin, 40 ng/ml for (S)-warfarin, 2.5 ng/ml for (R)-7-hydroxywarfarin and 4.5 ng/ml for (S)-7-hydroxywarfarin in 0.5 ml of both plasma and urine. The ultrafiltration technique was used for determining unbound concentrations of warfarin enantiomers in plasma using [14C]warfarin enantiomers resolved by the present HPLC system. Clinical applicability of the method was evaluated by determining unbound concentrations of warfarin enantiomers in five consecutive plasma samples obtained from a patient exhibiting an unstable anticoagulant response to warfarin (4 mg/day, p.o.). Results indicated that the present method would be useful in clarifying factors responsible for a large intra- and inter-patient variability in warfarin effects with regard to unbound plasma enantiomer pharmacokinetics.