Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3717178

Solving problems through staff participation in focus groups.

Abstract

Use of a survey and employee focus groups to solve problems in a hospital pharmacy department is described. All pharmacy staff members were asked to identify perceived problems; 33% completed the written questionnaire. Managers clarified the survey comments and ranked problems for priority, using nominal group technique. Focus groups were formed to address appropriate problems; for each focus group supervisors selected two pharmacists and two technicians who volunteered or were nominated by peers. A pharmacy resident was the facilitator for each group. Meeting weekly for one hour, each group defined problems, set priorities, gathered ideas, analyzed possible solutions, and proposed a solution to the pharmacy supervisors. One group proposed guidelines for staff scheduling and seven-days-on, seven-days-off rotations for night pharmacists; the other proposed a structure for technician training in the department and a required orientation and training schedule for all employees. This process required more staff time than unilateral management decisions would have, but the solutions were acceptable to all levels of staff members. The focus group process was effective in identifying and solving problems at this hospital. Routine resurveys will be conducted and new focus groups will be formed to address problems that would benefit from analysis and consensus by employees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M S Phillips, B C McGowan, R B Williams. 1986. Solving problems through staff participation in focus groups.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3717178/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Public sector buying spree. In a spate of Sunbelt deals, four publicly owned systems have bought five hospitals to adapt to market pressures.

Like traders in the pits, public hospital systems have been yelling "Buy, buy" in recent months. The commodities in question: not-for-profit hospitals. With a Wall Street spirit, public hospitals claim the latest acquisitions are simply a response to market pressure. Economist Stephen Zuckerman, left, calls the trend "surprising." Major pros and cons, however, give this particular investment high stakes.

Florida↗

Source of radium in a well-water-augmented Florida lake.

A study of the lake waters of Saddleback Lake, Florida was undertaken with the goal of determining the source of elevated radium activities in the lake. Four radium isotopes, (226)Ra, (228)Ra, (223)Ra and (224)Ra, were measured and activities of all the four radium isotopes were substantially greater in the well water used to augment the lake as compared to the lake waters. In the surface water, radium activities were highest close to the well used for augmentation in the initial sampling. Activities initially decreased with time after augmentation from the well ceased. The (223)Ra/(226)Ra activity ratio decreased during the first month of sampling and closely followed an exponential decay curve based on the (223)Ra decay constant. Trends in the activities and the (223)Ra/(226)Ra activity ratios support the conclusion that the well used to augment the lake was the dominant source of (223)Ra and (226)Ra to Saddleback Lake during this study. The (224)Ra/(226)Ra activity ratio did not follow the expected trend of exponential decay based on the (224)Ra decay constant. While the augmentation well supplied some (224)Ra, these results suggest that there must be an additional source of (224)Ra to the lake. The most likely additional source of (224)Ra appears to be the ingrowth of (224)Ra on the sediment within the lake from (228)Ra (via (228)Th).

Florida↗