Antiemetic studies: a methodological discussion.

I N Olver; R M Simon; J Aisner

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3708607

Antiemetic studies: a methodological discussion.

I N Olver·R M Simon·J Aisner

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Methodological issues encountered in reviewing the antiemetic literature are discussed. Variables affecting antiemetic assessment include those relating to the patient, the emetic stimulus, and the differences in action of the antiemetic drugs. Study design questions including the desirability of randomization, double blinding, use of controls, and stratifications for factors such as previous exposure to chemotherapy and strength of the emetic stimulus are discussed. From a statistical viewpoint a parallel subject design with adequate sample size is recommended. The problems of standardizing the evaluation of nausea and vomiting are considered and simple ordinal scales grading severity are suggested. The patient's overall assessment of tolerance of therapy is of primary importance.

Explore related subjects

Antiemetics Clinical Trials as Topic Double-Blind Method Humans Patient Participation Placebos Quality Control Random Allocation Research Design Statistics as Topic Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

I N Olver, R M Simon, J Aisner. 1986. Antiemetic studies: a methodological discussion.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3708607/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of aprepitant in outpatients receiving antiemetic prophylaxis for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains a major adverse effect of cancer therapy. We aimed to determine outcomes associated with use of aprepitant in outpatients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Germany from a patient's and payer's perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared an aprepitant regimen (aprepitant/ondansetron/dexamethasone) to a control regimen (ondansetron/dexamethasone) over a five days period. Clinical results and resource utilisation observed in aprepitant phase III clinical trials were assigned German unit cost data. RESULTS: Complete response over one chemotherapy cycle was observed in 68% of patients in the aprepitant group (N=514) compared to 48% of patients in the control group (N=518). Patients were estimated to have gained an equivalent of 15 additional hours of perfect health per cycle (0.63 quality-adjusted life days) with aprepitant-based regimen compared to control regimen. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained with aprepitant was estimated at euro28,891. CONCLUSIONS: Aprepitant substantially improved CINV-related health outcomes in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Incremental benefits materialised in a cost-effective fashion.

Antiemetics↗

PubMed2006

Antiemetic activity of corticosteroids in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: dosing, efficacy, and tolerability analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the standards of treatment for many patients with cancer, but these modalities are often limited by distressing side-effects, most notably chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: This paper considers the role of corticosteroids in CINV prophylaxis. Clinical trial results and treatment guidelines indicate that even with the emergence of new serotonin and neurokinin receptor antagonists, corticosteroids continue to play an important role in antiemesis for oncology patients. Numerous clinical trial results have demonstrated that both dexamethasone and methylprednisolone are effective as monotherapy and in combination with older and more recently developed antiemetic agents in patients receiving a wide range of chemotherapeutic regimens used for treatment of different cancers. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing number of antineoplastic regimens and factors specific to individual patients, it is important to frequently review antiemetic treatment options and continually monitor therapeutic progress to establish the optimal therapy for each patient.

Antiemetics↗

PubMed2006

Aprepitant when added to a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of ondansetron and dexamethasone does not affect vinorelbine pharmacokinetics in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Aprepitant, a selective neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist approved for the treatment and prevention of emesis caused by moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy, is an inhibitor, inducer, and substrate of the cytochrome P450 3194 pathway. The CYP3A4 pathway is the major pathway of the metabolism of vinorelbine, a vinca alkaloid frequently used in combination with cisplatin. Therefore, we studied the potential interaction of the aprepitant 3-day antiemetic regimen on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with metastatic solid tumors were included in this open-label, balanced, 2-period crossover study. In treatment arm A, vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 weekly) was administered alone, while in treatment arm B the same dose of vinorelbine was administered following the administration of the aprepitant antiemetic regimen on day 1 and alone on day 8. The antiemetic regimen of aprepitant was comprised of the following; on day 1: 125 mg aprepitant, 12 mg dexamethasone, and 32 mg ondansetron; on days 2 and 3: 80 mg aprepitant and 8 mg dexamethasone and on day 4: 8 mg dexamethasone. Blood samples for vinorelbine pharmacokinetic analysis were collected over 96 h. RESULTS: Two patients discontinued the study due to adverse events that were judged not to be drug-related. Complete pharmacokinetic data of vinorelbine administered alone and with the aprepitant antiemetic regimen were obtained in 12 patients. The mean plasma concentration profile of vinorelbine administered with aprepitant was identical to that following vinorelbine administered alone, with geometric mean vinorelbine plasma AUC ratios of treatment B day 1/treatment A day 1 and of treatment B day 8/treatment A day of 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) and 1.00 (0.92, 1.08), respectively. CONCLUSION: As the aprepitant antiemetic regimen has no detectable inhibitory or inductive effect on the pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine, aprepitant when added to a standard antiemetic regimen consisting of ondansetron and dexamethasone can be safely combined with vinorelbine at clinically recommended doses.

Antiemetics↗