Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3674940

Steroid scare.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T J David. 1987. Steroid scare.. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.62.9.876

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of beclomethasone, salmeterol, and placebo in children with asthma. Canadian Beclomethasone Dipropionate-Salmeterol Xinafoate Study Group.

BACKGROUND: An inhaled glucocorticoid is currently the medication of choice for long-term control of persistent asthma in children. The role of long-acting beta2-adrenergic-receptor agonists, such as salmeterol, needs to be defined. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, one-year study of 241 children (mean [+/-SD] age, 9.3+/-2.4 years) with clinically stable asthma and less than one month of prior glucocorticoid use. We compared inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (200 microg twice daily) with salmeterol xinafoate (50 microg twice daily) and placebo (lactose). The primary outcome measure, airway responsiveness (as assessed with a methacholine challenge) was evaluated before treatment; after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment (12 and 36 hours after study medications had been withheld); and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. Spirometry, symptoms, use of rescue medication (200 microg of albuterol inhaled as needed), and adverse effects were also assessed. RESULTS: During months 1 through 12 overall, beclomethasone was associated with significantly less airway hyperresponsiveness than salmeterol (P= 0.003) or placebo (P<0.001). This effect was lost two weeks after treatment had been stopped. As compared with placebo, beclomethasone was associated with less variability between morning and evening in the peak expiratory flow (P=0.002), as was salmeterol (P=0.02). Beclomethasone was also associated with a reduced need for albuterol as rescue therapy (P<0.001) and fewer withdrawals because of asthma exacerbations (P=0.03), but salmeterol was not (P=0.09 and 0.55, respectively). During months 1 through 12, linear growth was 3.96 cm in the children receiving beclomethasone, as compared with 5.40 cm in the salmeterol group (P=0.004) and 5.04 cm in the placebo group (P=0.018). Height was not measured after treatment ended. CONCLUSIONS: Beclomethasone was effective in reducing airway hyperresponsiveness and in controlling symptoms of asthma, but it was associated with decreased linear growth. Salmeterol was not as effective as beclomethasone in reducing airway hyperresponsiveness or in controlling symptoms; however, it was an effective bronchodilator and was not associated with rebound airway hyperresponsiveness, masking of symptoms, or adverse effects.

Administration, Inhalation

Effect of antipanic treatment on response to carbon dioxide.

BACKGROUND: Disordered breathing among patients with panic disorder, including hyperventilation during attacks and increased anxiogenic response to carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation, is well established. We wished to assess whether there is a change in the physiological response to CO2 after patients have undergone antipanic therapy with either tricyclic antidepressants or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with panic disorder underwent baseline CO2 sensitivity testing using the traditional Read rebreathing method and then received either antidepressant treatment (n = 21) or CBT (n = 8). After completing treatment, CO2 testing was repeated. A comparison sample of 14 normal volunteers also had two CO2 sensitivity tests, separated by an average of 21.6 (SD = 8.8) weeks. RESULTS: Using a liberal standard, in which all CO2 sensitivity tests whose correlations between minute ventilation and end-tidal CO2 were at least .75 were used, patients, but not controls, demonstrated a significant reduction in CO2 sensitivity between the first and second test. Using a more conservative .90 correlation standard reduced the sample size available and resulted in trend reduction in patients but no significant change in controls. There was a suggestion that the change was most pronounced in treatment responders, although the number of patient nonresponders is extremely small in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that treatment reduces CO2 sensitivity in patients with panic disorder. We speculate that manipulation of the serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission systems, both known to play a role in the control of respiration, may have a specific effect in reducing respiratory hyperactivity in panic disorder.

Administration, Inhalation