PubMed · 3657863
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1987-10-15. The EC-IC bypass study.. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198710153171614
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The natural history of giant intracranial aneurysms are grave. More than 50% of patients suffer from rupture of these aneurysms and mortality is >60% in 2 years. Modern technology and advancement of knowledge in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology have altered its natural course for the better. As many reports have shown, the majority of these aneurysms can be treated either by surgery or by endovascular approach, even though morbidity is higher than when treating smaller aneurysms. Certain aneurysms are more suitable to direct surgical clipping and others may have better chances of good clinical outcome by endovascular treatment. It is imperative to analyse the location, morphology, hemodynamics and circulation of normal brain of each aneurysm before the mode of treatment is decided. Needless to say, the individual patient's age, neurological and medical condition should be considered. For endovascular treatment, application of each technique, endosaccular occlusion or parent artery occlusion depends on the aneurysm location and geometry as well as its pathology. Several reports indicated that clinical outcome is better in patients treated by parent artery occlusion since it eliminates any blood flow to the aneurysm and it provides a more effective reduction of the mass effect. However, not all parent arteries can be sacrificed. In addition, endosaccular treatment is effective in preventing haemorrhage if the aneurysm is not re-canalised. It is also demonstrated that symptoms of mass effect can be reversed by endosaccular coiling. The patients who are treated this way should be closely monitored for re-canalisation.
Minimally invasive surgeries by innovative approaches are practiced in all fields. The evolution of microneurosurgery has revolutionized the results in neurosurgery. Use of endoscopes and navigation has made microsurgery less invasive. Another development to make minimally invasive microneurosurgery further lesser invasive is the use of micromanipulator. The use and effectiveness of manually controlled micromanipulator system is presented. The manually controlled micromanipulator system consists of three parts, i.e., a basic micromanipulator, manipulator supporting device and the manual control. The micromanipulator fitted in supporting device is arranged before the start of surgery. The supporting device used is pneumatically driven powered endoscopic holding device (Mitaka Kohki Co., Tokyo) In maximum number of times we used the system for endoscopic assisted cerebrovascular microneurosurgery. In a span of two months we used it in thirty aneurysm clipping surgeries. The endoscope fitted in system has three ranges of motions (forward/backward, upside/down and sideways). We use MACHIDA rigid endoscope with internal diameter of 2.7 mm (smallest diameter endoscope available). Special features of this endoscope are accurate visualization at a deeper plane, stable movements and availability of single focus point for long time. All these features are valuable during pre- and postoperative clipping observation. The aim of development of micromanipulator system was to further reduce invasiveness. A significant improvement in manual dexterity is possible when working through the micromanipulator interface, which dampens human physiological tremor. The physiological tremor would render the manual dexterity unsafe at the end of lever arm of long instruments. Thus, the use endoscope becomes practical. The minimally invasive microneurosurgery can be further made lesser invasive by use of micromanipulator and we are convinced that this will facilitate more accurate and promising results in microneurosurgery.