PubMed · 3647611
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Mosse. 1987. [Simple and complex sugars].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3647611/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: We analyzed myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients with non-insulin-dependent (type II) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) without symptoms and signs of ischemia. BACKGROUND: Diminished MFR in diabetes has been suggested. However, it remains controversial whether MFR is related to glycemic control, mode of therapy or gender in NIDDM. METHODS: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured at baseline and during dipyridamole loading in 25 asymptomatic, normotensive, normocholesterolemic patients with NIDDM and 12 age-matched control subjects by means of positron emission tomography and nitrogen-13 ammonia, after which MFR was calculated. RESULTS: Baseline MBF in patients with NIDDM ([mean +/- SD] 74.0 +/- 24.0 ml/min per 100 g body weight) was comparable to that in control subjects (73.0 +/- 17.0 ml/min per 100 g). However, MBF during dipyridamole loading was significantly lower in patients with NIDDM (184 +/- 99.0 ml/min per 100 g, p < 0.01) than in control subjects (262 +/- 120 ml/min per 100 g), as was MFR (NIDDM: 2.77 +/- 0.85; control subjects: 3.8 +/- 1.0, p < 0.01). A significantly decreased MFR was seen in men (2.35 +/- 0.84) compared with women with NIDDM (3.18 +/- 0.79, p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were found in terms of age, hemoglobin a1c and baseline MBF. MFR was comparable between the diet (2.78 +/- 0.80) and medication therapy groups (2.76 +/- 0.77) and was inversely correlated with average hemoglobin A1c for 5 years (r = -0.55, p < 0.01) and fasting plasma glucose concentration (r = -0.57, p < 0.01) but not age or lipid fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control and gender, rather than mode of therapy, is related to MFR in NIDDM.
Insulin resistance is common in patients with angina pectoris, a positive exercise electrocardiogram, and normal coronary angiograms (syndrome X). It is still not known whether insulin resistance affects the cardiac muscle itself and, if so, whether insulin resistance involves myocardial hemodynamics and energy metabolism. We investigated hemodynamics as well as metabolite exchanges across the heart and the forearm in eight patients with syndrome X and eight control subjects during a baseline period after an overnight fast and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Myocardial hemodynamics and metabolism were studied at rest, during pace stress, and in the recovery period after pacing. Neither coronary sinus blood flow nor forearm blood flow differed between the groups before and during the clamp. Whole body insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was decreased in the patients (15.6+/-2.1 vs. 23.1+/-2.0 micromol x kg-1 x min-1). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in the forearm and the cardiac muscle was equally reduced in the patients (46+/-5 and 48+/-5%). Myocardial glucose uptake correlated with total arterial delivery in the control subjects (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), but not in patients (r = 0.22, P = 0.13). Carbohydrate and lipid oxidation was similar in the two groups at rest, and changes during the clamp were not different in control subjects and patients either at rest, during pacing, or in the recovery period. Patients with syndrome X exhibit myocardial insulin resistance, but cardiac energy metabolism remains unaffected. In patients with syndrome X, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake is independent from myocardial blood flow.