PubMed · 3641407
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F de Roquefeuil, C Goupil. 1986. [Sintrom].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3641407/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: In most countries, heparin is used in the initial treatment of patients with deep-vein thrombosis. Well-designed studies establishing the efficacy of heparin therapy are lacking, however. Treatment with acenocoumarol alone, according to the hypothesis that high dosages of oral anticoagulants obviate the need for heparin, is considered an effective alternative in some countries. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study we compared the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous heparin plus acenocoumarol with the efficacy and safety of acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of outpatients with proximal-vein thrombosis. The principal study end point was a confirmed symptomatic extension or recurrence of venous thromboembolism during six months of follow-up. In addition, we assessed asymptomatic extension or pulmonary embolism by repeating venography and lung scanning after the first week of treatment. The incidence of major bleeding was determined during three months of follow-up. RESULTS: The study was terminated early by the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee because of an excess of symptomatic events in the group that received acenocoumarol alone (in 12 of 60 patients [20 percent], as compared with 4 of 60 patients [6.7 percent] in the combined-therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis; P = 0.058). Asymptomatic extension of venous thrombosis was observed in 39.6 percent of the patients in the acenocoumarol group and in 8.2 percent of patients treated with heparin plus acenocoumarol (P < 0.001). Major bleeding complications were infrequent and comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with proximal-vein thrombosis require initial treatment with full-dose heparin, which can safely be combined with acenocoumarol therapy.
One hundred and three patients suffering from recurrent venous thrombosis, recurrent arterial thromboembolism and/or recurrent myocardial infarction and 50 healthy subjects were tested for Hageman factor (FXII) coagulant activity and antigen. Among the 103 patients we identified 15 subjects with FXII deficiency (15%), 3 with protein C deficiency (3%) and 3 with protein S deficiency (3%). Combined FXII and protein C, protein S or antithrombin III deficiency was not observed. The 103 patients were divided into subgroups according to the type of thrombotic complication. Among patients with exclusively recurrent venous thromboembolism 8% (p = 0.153) were deficient in FXII. Among patients suffering from recurrent arterial thromboembolism and/or myocardial infarction, the incidence of FXII deficiency was significantly higher (20%, p less than 0.003). In 67% of the patients with FXII deficiency a positive family history of thrombosis could be established. In contrast, only 32% of all venous and 28% of all arterial thrombosis patients had a positive family history. We believe that reduced levels of FXII should be considered as a risk factor in the development of thromboembolism. Consequently, more attention should be payed to the measurement of FXII when evaluating thromboembolic risk factors especially in cases of recurrent arterial thromboembolism and/or myocardial infarction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.