Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3617536

Temporal integration in amblyopic vision.

Abstract

Amblyopic subjects were tested on different visual tasks which required temporal integration of successively presented stimuli: a figure had to be detected whose components were displayed successively and hidden in spatio-temporal noise. The time interval T over which the figure elements were dispersed was varied and the longest T value still compatible with figure detection was determined. In all subjects these T values were considerably longer for the normal than for the amblyopic eye. A missing square had to be detected in a checker-board of 3 X 3 squares that was presented in two successive frames, each frame containing 4 squares. With the normal eye, identification of the missing square was possible over considerably longer interstimulus intervals (ISIs) than with the amblyopic eye. Changes had to be detected in two patterns of randomly distributed squares that were presented successively with varying ISI whereby one square was added or subtracted in the second pattern. With the normal eye, detection of changes was possible over much longer ISIs than with the amblyopic eye. These experiments show a deficit of the amblyopic visual system to integrate temporally separated stimuli. We conclude that amblyopia is associated with a marked reduction of the duration of visual persistence and suggest that this is due to shortening of normally sustained neuronal responses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Altmann, W Singer. 1986. Temporal integration in amblyopic vision.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(86)90121-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Compelling classroom demonstrations that link visual system anatomy, physiology, and behaviour.

One of our approaches to teaching a course in anatomy and physiology is to stress the fundamental, systems-level concepts. One successful strategy we use is to continually highlight the relationships among anatomy, physiology, and behavior. In this article, we describe a set of classroom demonstrations that stress these links while fostering critical thinking. These demonstrations, on the topic of sensory system structure and function, rely on two perceptual consequences of neural adaptation in the visual system: afterimages and aftereffects. Viewing specific visual stimuli under binocular or monocular conditions with interocular transfer permits several concepts to be observed and discussed, including neural adaptation, anatomical and functional segregation of visual system pathways, and the relationship among visual system structure, function, and perception. This article discusses how to produce and present the required visual stimuli, suggests a set of questions to stimulate critical thinking, and presents student evaluation of this activity.

Afterimage↗

Effects of negative afterimages in visual illusions.

We show that a broad class of visual illusions, including illusory motion, can be explained by the effects of negative afterimages. Two new illusions, illusory shading and illusory tilting, are devised on the basis of the proposed explanation. The general feature of these illusions is an alternation between a high-contrast (white or black) and a low-contrast (gray) local input signal, which can be caused either by eye motion over patterns of varied luminance or by a change in such patterns over time. A simple model of the local signal dynamics qualitatively reproduces the illusory effects by adding the negative afterimage to the original visual stimulus.

Afterimage↗

Shine-through: temporal aspects.

If a vernier stimulus precedes a grating for a very short time, the vernier either remains invisible, but may bequeath some of its properties to the grating (feature inheritance), or might shine through keeping its features - depending on the number of grating elements [Herzog, M. H. & Koch, C., 2001. Seeing properties of an invisible element: feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 98, 4271-4275]. Feature inheritance and shine-through represent two different states of feature binding [Herzog, M. H., Koch, C., & Fahle, M., Switching binding states. Visual Cognition (in press)], whereas shine-through depends in subtle ways on the spatial layout of the grating [Herzog, M. H., Fahle, M., & Koch, C., (2001). Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through Vision Research]. Here, we show that also temporal parameters of the grating influence shine-through. For example, a delayed presentation of certain grating elements can deteriorate performance dramatically.

Afterimage↗