Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3589242

Modified replacement randomization.

U Abel
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a slight modification of replacement randomization by imposing an imbalance criterion within a restricted range of patient entry numbers. The bound on imbalance is stated most simply in terms of the maximum allowable difference in treatment assignments at the end of the trial. For clinical trials in which two therapies are compared, we study, by means of computer simulations, the dependence of both selection bias and the mean number of randomization list replacements on the parameters defining the procedure.

Explore related subjects

BiometryClinical Trials as TopicHumansRandom AllocationResearch DesignJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Abel. 1987. Modified replacement randomization.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Coloured noise or low-dimensional chaos?

Devising a method capable of distinguishing a low-dimensional chaotic signal that might be embedded in a noisy stochastic process has become a major challenge for those involved in time-series analysis. Here a null hypothesis approach is used in conjunction with a known nonlinear predictive test, to probe for the presence of chaos in epidemiological data. A probabilistic set of rules is used to stimulate a historic record of New York City measles outbreaks, generally understood to be governed by a chaotic attractor. The simulated runs of 'surrogate data' are carefully constructed so as to be free from any underlying low-dimensional chaotic process. They therefore serve as a useful null model against which to test the observed time series. However, despite the assumed differences between the dynamics of measles outbreaks and the null model, a nonlinear predictive scheme is found to be unable to differentiate between their characteristic time series. The methodology confirms that, if there is in fact a chaotic signal in the measles data, it is extremely difficult to detect in time series of such limited length. The results have general relevance to the analysis of physical, ecological and environmental time series.

Biometry↗