Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3576014

What do doctors know about statistics?

H R Wulff·B Andersen·P Brandenhoff·F Guttler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A multiple choice test with nine statistical questions was sent to a random sample of Danish doctors to assess their knowledge of elementary statistical expressions (SD, SE, p less than 0.05, p greater than 0.05 and r). One hundred and forty eight (59 per cent) of 250 doctors answered the questions. The test was also completed by 97 participants in postgraduate courses in research methods, mainly junior hospital doctors. The median number of correct answers was 2.4 in the random sample and 4.0 in the other sample of doctors. It is concluded that the statistical knowledge of most doctors is so limited that they cannot be expected to draw the right conclusions from those statistical analyses which are found in papers in medical journals. Sixty-five per cent of the doctors in the random sample stated that it is very important that this problem is raised.

Explore related subjects

BiometryDenmarkEducation, MedicalPhysiciansJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H R Wulff, B Andersen, P Brandenhoff, F Guttler. What do doctors know about statistics?. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780060103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Statistical procedures for estimating the detection limit and determination limit of the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay.

Novel and flexible procedures for estimating the detection limit as well as the determination limit of the Ames mutagenicity assay were proposed to evaluate the genetoxicity of a water sample. The accumulated data under the test conditions of TA 100-S9 by our group were taken as examples and analyzed to estimate the detection limit and the determination limit. The detection limit was estimated at 1.7 as the MR value when duplicate plates were used in the negative control test. However, it decreased to 1.4 as the MR level when quadruple plates were used in the negative control test. Therefore it was found that the sensitivity of the Ames mutagenicity assay was improved very easily by increasing the number of plates for the negative control test from two to four. The application of the conventional twofold rule to the data obtained with the strain TA100 was considered too conservative. The determination limit was regarded at 2.2 as the MR value under the following conditions: (a) quadruple plates were used in the negative control test; (b) three dose-steps including negative control step were designed at regular intervals; and (c) duplicate plates were used for each dose-step. It was proved by comparing data of two students that the detection limit and the determination limit estimated in this study were considered acceptable to any well trained students.

Biometry↗