PubMed · 3545378
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J P Blandy, C G Fowler. 1986. Lower tract endoscopy.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072139
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Laser resection (LR) of posterior urethral valves during infancy as early as possible after diagnosis appears to represent a safe and reliable method. In contrast to other procedures, LR allows valve ablation with thin cystoscopes and carries little risk, even in premature and newborn infants. Its application in seven children in the course of 2 years principally confirmed its suitability for use: it could be applied in all cases without any problems and led to extensive resection of the valve tissue and removal of the obstruction in all patients. The encouraging clinical findings were confirmed by control cystoscopies and micturating cystourethrograms. Complications arising from the method were not observed.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on the planned procedure and associated cost of cystoscopy performed immediately before the surgical repair of vesicoureteral reflux. Cystoscopy is commonly performed at the time of ureteroneocystostomy to rule out a previously unsuspected anomaly such as ureterocele or ureteral duplication. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of preoperative voiding cystourethrograms and ultrasound studies performed on 128 patients who underwent ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux between 1994 and 2000. Radiographic findings were compared with observations made at cystoscopy and reimplantation to determine the rate of unsuspected ureterocele or duplication in the presence of a radiologic evaluation considered adequate by the operating surgeon and/or radiologist. We then performed an itemized analysis to determine the cost cystoscopy contributed to the procedure. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients, 1 (0.7%) was found to have a small, undiagnosed ureterocele at cystoscopy. A review of this patient's preoperative evaluation revealed that her ultrasound examination was incomplete, lacking views of the bladder. At our institution, cystoscopy increased the total direct and indirect operating room costs of this procedure by 16.2%, adding $123.77 to the original cost of $762.97. CONCLUSIONS: Routine cystoscopic examination before ureteral reimplantation in the setting of an adequate preoperative radiologic evaluation yields little diagnostic information. In this series, it did not have an impact on the surgical procedure to be performed but did add significantly to the cost. Cystoscopy before ureteral reimplantation for primary reflux should only be considered in those children with suspicious or inadequate radiologic studies.
A case is reported in which complete disruption of the bulbous urethra resulted in a straddled-type injury, which was managed by endoscopic realignment with a thin trocar needle. The endoscopic urethroplasty consisted of: (i) direct observation of the proximal end of the obliterated urethra by an antegrade flexible cystoscope; (ii) adjustment of the direction of trocar penetration under fluoroscopy and direct vision; (iii) confirmation of the exact trocar position and penetration by antegrade flexible cystoscope; and (iv) placement of the guidewire following the trocar penetration as guidance for urethrotomy. A Foley catheter was left in place for 6 weeks. To date, no further endoscopic revision has been required. Although long-term follow up and more experience are required, this technique is reported because it appears to be safe, reproducible, simple and minimally invasive.