Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3536442

Head trauma.

Abstract

Head injury is a common occurrence in the multiply injured patient. Because it is so common, physicians in busy emergency rooms should be well versed in its evaluation and treatment. A guide to appropriate evaluation and treatment has been established by Becker et al. Patients can be divided into four categories, depending on degree of neurologic injury. Group I patients suffer transient loss of consciousness only and then return to normal; they require observation only. Group II patients suffer loss of consciousness and continue to have impaired cognitive functions; they require observation and a CT scan. Group III patients suffer loss of consciousness, continue to have disordered cognitive functions, and have significant motor deficits. This group can be subdivided into patients with and without focal neurologic deficits. Both of these will require aggressive therapy to control intracranial hypertension, CT scanning, and possibly surgery. The last category, group IV, includes patients who meet the requirements of brain death. No further work-up or therapy is needed for this group. Patients who suffer head injury are at risk for many complications, but two that are emphasized are postconcussion seizures and the postconcussion syndrome. Identifying factors that predispose the patient to these complications can help to minimize their occurrence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J G Frazee. 1986. Head trauma.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3536442/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Psychiatry and the military: an update.

The United States has historically been concerned about the successful adjustment of its military members returning from war. These concerns are based on the recognition that war-zone exposures may have considerable negative emotional or behavior consequences. As the global war on terror continues, the United States military medical system will be required to address issues at the interface of psychiatry and the law. Despite clinical advances within the theater of war and at tertiary facilities in the United States, some military members will develop chronic and disabling mental illness as a result of traumatic exposure and exacerbated by the demands of the austere and dangerous operational environment. The extent to which violent and aggressive behavior in the aftermath of deployment can be attributed to combat experience remains an area of debate and ongoing investigation. However, experience suggests that a very small subgroup of the hundreds of thousands of war veterans deployed in conjunction with the current conflict in Iraq has already been involved in violent crimes. For this group, military forensic psychiatrists will be called on to make determinations of competency and criminal responsibility and to inform the courts about the potential contributions of war-related distress or disorder to criminal behavior. Though the overwhelming majority of war veterans will not be involved in criminal proceedings, a minority will develop career-ending (and in rare instances, life-ending) disabilities as a result of mental illness. For those who are no longer fit for duty, the military Physical Disability Evaluation System must make determinations of the extent to which future military performance and future civilian social and occupational function have been compromised. For a small yet highly visible minority of returning veterans, questions about the cause, precipitants, and manner of death will necessitate psychological autopsies. This article highlighted recent updates in military forensic psychiatry and the mechanisms through which answers to questions of disability and criminal culpability, and motivation underpinning self-injurious behavior, are determined within the United States military. As the global war on terror progresses, further experience and study of our country's judicial processes, disability system, and the policies and procedures governing psychological autopsies must evolve to meet these increasing demands.

Brain Concussion↗

Concussion management by primary care providers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current concussion management practices of primary care providers. METHODS: An 11 item questionnaire was mailed to primary care providers in the state of Maine, with serial mailings to non-respondents. RESULTS: Over 50% of the questionnaires were completed, with nearly 70% of primary care providers indicating that they routinely use published guidelines as a tool in managing patients with concussion. Nearly two thirds of providers were aware that neuropsychological tests could be used, but only 16% had access to such tests within a week of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers are using published concussion management guidelines with high frequency, but many are unable to access neuropsychological testing when it is required.

Brain Concussion↗

Waveform Window.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Brain Concussion↗