Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3410718

Plutonium mining for cleanup.

Abstract

Cleanup is the act of making a contaminated site relatively free of Pu so it may be used without radiological safety restrictions. Contaminated ground is the focus of major cleanups. Cleanup traditionally involves determining Pu content of soil, digging up soil in which radioactivity exceeds guidelines, and relocating excised soil to a waste-disposal site. Alternative technologies have been tested at Johnston Atoll (JA), where there is as much as 100,000 m3 of Pu-contaminated soil. A mining pilot plant operated for the first 6 mo of 1986 and made 98% of soil tested "clean", from more than 40 kBq kg-1 (1000 pCi g-1) to less than about 500 Bq kg-1 (15 pCi g-1) by concentrating Pu in 2% of the soil. The pilot plant is now installed at the U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Test Site for evaluating cleanup of other contaminated soils and refining cleanup effectiveness. A full-scale cleanup plant has been programmed for JA in 1988. In this paper, previous cleanups are reviewed, and the mining endeavor at JA is detailed. "True soil cleanup" is contrasted with the classical "soil relocation cleanup." The mining technology used for Pu cleanup has been in use for more than a century. Mining for cleanup, however, is unique. It is envisioned as being prominent for radiological and other cleanups in the future.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E T Bramlitt. 1988. Plutonium mining for cleanup.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198808000-00046

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Simplified soil washing processes for a variety of soils.

A soil washing process is described in which high shear mixing, sprays, hydrosizing, flotation, and screening are integrated to countercurrently clean sand, silt and clay. Chemical techniques are summarized that can be used to remove selected contaminants from the soil and then clean the wash water for reuse. Descriptions of simple and complex processes, and a recent project are used to illustrate the points: (1) Soil washing is not a single process, but a collection of unit operations assembled for each project; (2) all process must be coordinated for the project to be successful; and (3) combining techniques in a few pieces of equipment debottlenecks soil washing.

Decontamination

Vertical column hydroclassification of metal-contaminated soils.

The purpose of this work was to reduce soil volumes requiring aggressive treatment. A second purpose was to determine differences in separation due to distinct forms of the metal contamination and soil texture. The objectives were to apply hydroclassification and find mass and metal-contaminant distribution of four soils contaminated with heavy metals from firing ranges, a small arms incinerator, and an electroplating operation. The soils were slurried in water, sieved, and exposed to upward flowing water to separate the soil particles into four nominal size ranges. The popping furnace soil exhibited substantial lead among all particle size fractions. The firing range soils exhibited bimodal distributions. The electroplating soil exhibited a strong concentration of metals toward the <63 microm fraction. Attrition scrubbing moderately improved the enrichment of metals in several fractions. Extraction revealed the lead and chromium in the electroplating soil to be relatively immobile. These results suggest metal distributions are influenced by the different mechanisms of introduction into the soil. They also help to predict performance of processing options such as sieving hydroclassification and attrition scrubbing.

Decontamination