Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3404313

Sampling irregularity perturbs visual reconstruction.

Abstract

We explored the human observer's ability to detect and discriminate sine-wave and square-wave gratings that were sampled at intervals varying from 4.7 to 9.4 arcmin. To study the effect of sampling irregularity on visual performance, we varied the position of each line sample on the basis of a Gaussian probability distribution, the standard deviation of which varied from 0 (regular sampling) to 4.7 arcmin (highly irregular sampling). The results indicate that irregular sampling has no systematic effect on the observer's ability merely to detect the presence of a sine- or square-wave grating. In contrast, sampling irregularity strongly impairs the subject's ability to discriminate between these waveforms. A model based on the convolution of difference-of-Gaussians-type weighting profiles predicted that sampling irregularity should have little to no effect on the output of a channel tuned to the third harmonic of the square-wave grating. The findings thus suggest the existence of a sampling scheme in the visual system. This scheme is based on local feature-selective mechanisms, probably edge detectors, that are highly sensitive to the relative position of the sample points in the space domain.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Nyman, M W Greenlee, P Laurinen. 1988. Sampling irregularity perturbs visual reconstruction.. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.5.000628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological