Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3390508

Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data.

Abstract

Multiple logistic regression is a commonly used multivariate technique for analyzing data with a binary outcome. One assumption needed for this method of analysis is the independence of outcome for all sample points in a data set. In ophthalmologic data and other types of correlated binary data, this assumption is often grossly violated and the validity of the technique becomes an issue. A technique has been developed (Rosner, 1984) that utilizes a polychotomous logistic regression model to allow one to look at multiple exposure variables in the context of a correlated binary data structure. This model is an extension of the beta-binomial model, which has been widely used to model correlated binary data when no covariates are present. In this paper, a relationship is developed between the two techniques, whereby it is shown that use of ordinary logistic regression in the presence of correlated binary data can result in true significance levels that are considerably larger than nominal levels in frequently encountered situations. This relationship is explored in detail in the case of a single dichotomous exposure variable. In this case, the appropriate test statistic can be expressed as an adjusted chi-square statistic based on the 2 X 2 contingency table relating exposure to outcome. The test statistic is easily computed as a function of the ordinary chi-square statistic and the correlation between eyes (or more generally between cluster members) for outcome and exposure, respectively. This generalizes some previous results obtained by Koval and Donner (1987, in Festschrift for V. M. Joshi, I. B. MacNeill (ed.), Vol. V, 199-224.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Rosner, R C Milton. 1988. Significance testing for correlated binary outcome data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3390508/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Standard survival data measure the time span from some time origin until the occurrence of one type of event. If several types of events occur, a model describing progression to each of these competing risks is needed. Multi-state models generalize competing risks models by also describing transitions to intermediate events. Methods to analyze such models have been developed over the last two decades. Fortunately, most of the analyzes can be performed within the standard statistical packages, but may require some extra effort with respect to data preparation and programming. This tutorial aims to review statistical methods for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Although some conceptual issues are covered, the emphasis is on practical issues like data preparation, estimation of the effect of covariates, and estimation of cumulative incidence functions and state and transition probabilities. Examples of analysis with standard software are shown.

Biometry↗

The role of education in biostatistical consulting.

Medical students, residents, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty commonly consult with biostatistical experts about study design and data analysis when conducting clinical research. The role of biostatistical training during these consultations is examined, and characterizations of the connections between biostatistical consultation and education are reviewed. The presence and kinds of teaching efforts during biostatistical consults at four academic research institutions over various periods of time between 1999 and 2005 (237 consultations in total) were recorded and are described. By site, 67, 70, 78, and 100 per cent of the consulting sessions included biostatistical training, with an overall 78 per cent (95 per cent CI: 73-83 per cent) of consultations including an educational component when all consultations were combined. Training covered a wide range of biostatistical topics. Seventy-five per cent of the consultations with faculty (120/161), 79 per cent with fellows and residents (31/39), and 100 per cent with medical students (10/10) included some degree of instruction in study design or statistical analysis topics. Results show that both the need and the opportunity exist for specialized biostatistical instruction during one-on-one sessions between a consulting biostatistician and physicians, medical students, and research staff. Academic researchers are ideally positioned to absorb this kind of training when they initiate a request for assistance with their own research project.

Biometry↗

Improving the quality of patient care using reliability measures: a classification tree approach.

This paper considers the application and interpretation of new reliability measures for a classification tree-based medical risk assessment tool. Following the construction of a classification tree reliability measures may then be used to provide an estimate of the precision of the classification and the probability in each terminal node of the classification tree. Identification of unreliable nodes (those that have low precision) in this application may indicate patient groups requiring closer monitoring or scenarios in which further information about the patient is required, thereby providing medical practitioners with an avenue for more informed decision making.

Biometry↗