Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3345595

Are instrument evaluations worthwhile?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P M Broughton. 1988. Are instrument evaluations worthwhile?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9120(88)80105-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

The fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated in a multicenter trial. Test performance was evaluated for 2,014 endocervical swab and 1,278 urine specimens obtained from women and for 373 urethral swab and 254 urine specimens obtained from men. Culture served as the reference test. Culture-negative, COBAS AMPLICOR-positive specimens that tested positive in a confirmatory PCR test for an alternative target sequence within the C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein gene were resolved as true positives. The overall prevalence of chlamydia was 4.3% in cervical swabs and 11.0% in urethral swabs from men. When the results for each specimen type were considered separately, the resolved sensitivities were 96.5% (83 of 86) for endocervical swab specimens, 95.1% (39 of 41) for urine specimens from women, 100.0% (41 of 41) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 94.4% (17 of 18) for urine specimens from men; the resolved specificities were 99.4% (1,912 of 1,924) for endocervical swab specimens, 99.8% (1,204 of 1,207) for urine specimens from women, 98. 5% (325 of 330) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 100.0% (236 of 236) for urine specimens from men. For the subset of patients from whom both swab and urine specimens were collected, the combined results for both specimen types were used to identify all infected patients. Using these combined reslts as criteria, the resolved sensitivities for the COBAS AMPLICOR test were 82.6% (38 of 46) for endocervical swab specimens, 84.4% (38 of 45) for urine specimens from women, 84.2% (16 of 19) for urethral swab specimens from men, and 89.5% (17 of 19) for urine specimens from men. In comparison, the sensitivity of culture was only 56.5% (26 of 46) for endocervical specimens and 63.2% (12 of 19) for urethral specimens from men. The internal control provided in the COBAS AMPLICOR test revealed that 2.9% of specimens were inhibitory when they were initially tested. Nevertheless, valid results were obtained for 99. 1% of specimens because 68.7% of the inhibitory specimens were not inhibitory when a second aliquot of the original sample was tested. Two additional COBAS AMPLICOR-positive specimens were detected by retesting inhibitory specimens. The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for the detection of C. trachomatis exhibited equally high sensitivities and specificities with both urogenital swab and urine specimens and, thus, is well-suited for use in screening.

Automation

Automated breast tumor diagnosis and grading based on wavelet chromatin texture description.

In this paper, wavelets were employed for multi-scale image analysis to extract parameters for the description of chromatin texture in the cytological diagnosis and grading of invasive breast cancer. Their value was estimated by comparing the performance of co-occurrence, densitometric, and morphometric parameters in an automated K-nearest neighbor (Knn) classification scheme based on light microscopic images of isolated nuclei of paraffin-embedded tissue. This design allowed a multifaceted cytological retrospective study of which the practical value can be judged easily. Results show that wavelets perform excellently with classification scores comparable with densitometric and co-occurrence features. Moreover, because wavelets showed a high additive value with the other textural groups, this panel allowed a very profound description with higher recognition scores than previously reported (76% for individual nuclei, 100% for cases). Morphometric parameters performed less well and only slightly increased correct classification. The major drawback, besides image segmentation errors demanding operator supervision, emanated to be the few false-negative cases, which restrict the immediate practical use. However, an enlargement of the parameter set may avoid this misclassification, resulting in an applicable expert system of practical use.

Automation

Advances in the automated detection of metaphase chromosomes labeled with fluorescence dyes.

Applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for translocation studies and biological dosimetry would benefit substantially from reliable and efficient automatic detection of metaphase chromosomes labeled with fluorescent dyes. We replicated and evaluated a fluorescence metaphase finder previously developed at the Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genetics Unit (Scotland) and at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL; California). The MRC/LBL system seemed to detect nearly all of the metaphases on the test slides, but it presented an unacceptable number of false positives (about five false positives per one true positive). Furthermore, we determined that the system actually overcalled true detections by counting certain metaphase spreads twice (duplicates). Through modifications of the MRC/LBL system, we developed the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) system, which minimizes the detection of duplicates, incorporates new detection features, uses a binary decision tree (BDT) for classification, and provides functionalities to improve scanning accuracy and improve the post-detection review. To test the new system, DAPI-stained preparations of metaphase chromosomes from blood lymphocytes of four unrelated donors were placed on slides in drops ranging from 7 mm to 20 mm in diameter. Drops contained between 5 and 200 scorable metaphases each. The LLNL system achieved approximately 90% detection of non-duplicated metaphases as verified by an expert cytogeneticist, with typically less than one false positive per every one true positive detected.

Automation