Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3328133

Pelvic endometriosis.

Abstract

The recent heightened interest in endometriosis has led to remarkable progress in the elucidation of the pathophysiology of this enigmatic disease. Presently, it is not clear why some individuals with endometriosis develop infertility and pelvic pain, whereas others with a similar degree of disease do not. Several tantalizing clues have been extracted from studies of the molecular pathogenesis, immunology, and biochemistry of endometriosis. Investigations are now under way to determine the specific relevance to infertility of macrophage aggregation; prostaglandin and related metabolite production by endometriotic lesions and macrophages; specific factors released by endometriosis that might directly impair ovum pick-up, fertilization, embryo transfer, or implantation; and ovulatory dysfunction including luteal phase deficiency and LUFS. There are probably a host of potential mechanisms of infertility in endometriosis; additional research should enable us to determine their regulatory features and to formulate effective clinical intervention. We now have a broader array of options for the treatment of endometriosis than ever before. However, most of the extant reported clinical experience consists of case reports and limited series of patients without the use of controls, follow-up intervals, and appropriate statistical analysis. The diverse course and presentation of the disease have limited our ability to develop a staging system that provides consistent scoring among different clinicians and appropriate relative emphasis on the various manifestations of the disease. Some additional resolution will be necessary to assess the relative contribution to infertility by fresh and recurrent lesions, endometriomas, and adhesions. These problems are now in sharp focus, and data should be available in the future giving us an accurate appraisal of the clinical effectiveness of danazol, gestrinone, GnRH analogues, conservative surgery, laparoscopic surgery including use of the laser, IVF-ET, and GIFT. Also, it is anticipated that potentially fertile patients with endometriosis might be identified so that they could avoid therapy altogether.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Ory. 1987. Pelvic endometriosis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3328133/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Identification and Validation of Novel Combinatorial Genetic Risk Factors for Endometriosis across Multiple UK and US Patient Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis affects about 10% of women usually of reproductive age. It often has severe negative impacts on patients' quality of life, but the average time to a definitive diagnosis remains 7-9 years, and there are few effective therapeutic options. Relatively little is known about the genetic drivers of the disease even though its heritability is fairly high. A recent large genome wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis identified 42 genomic loci associated with risk of endometriosis, but together these explain only 5% of disease variance. METHODS: We used the PrecisionLife&#xae; combinatorial analytics platform to identify multi-SNP disease signatures significantly associated with endometriosis in a white European UK Biobank (UKB) cohort. We assessed the reproducibility of these multi-SNP disease signatures as well as 35 of the 42 meta-GWAS SNPs in a multi-ancestry American endometriosis cohort from All of Us (AoU) after controlling for population structure. RESULTS: We identified 1,709 disease signatures, comprising 2,957 unique SNPs in combinations of 2-5 SNPs, that were associated with increased prevalence of endometriosis in UKB. Pathways enriched in the disease signatures included cell adhesion, proliferation and migration, cytoskeleton remodeling, angiogenesis as well as biological processes involved in fibrosis and neuropathic pain.We observed a significant enrichment of these signatures (58-88%, p<0.04) that are also positively associated with endometriosis in the AoU cohort, including one 2-SNP signature that is individually significant. Reproducibility rates were greatest for higher frequency signatures, ranging from 80-88% for signatures with greater than 9% frequency (p<0.01) in AoU. Encouragingly, the disease signatures also show high reproducibility rates in non-white European AoU sub-cohorts (66-76%, p<0.04 for signatures with greater than 4% frequency).A total of 195 unique SNPs mapping to 98 genes were identified in the high frequency reproducing signatures (>9%). Of these, 7 genes were previously identified in the endometriosis meta-GWAS study and 16 genes have a previous association with endometriosis. 75 novel genes were identified in this study.We characterized 9 novel genes that occur at the highest frequency in reproducing signatures and that do not contain any SNPs linked to known GWAS genes, providing new evidence for links between endometriosis and autophagy and macrophage biology. Reproducibility rates, ranging between 73% to 85%. are especially strong for the signatures that contain these 9 genes independently of any SNPs mapping to the meta-GWAS genes. CONCLUSION: Although using much smaller, less well-characterized datasets than the previous whole genome meta-GWAS study, combinatorial analysis has provided important new insights into the genetics and biology of endometriosis including reproducible biologically relevant genes that are overlooked by GWAS approaches.The 75 novel gene associations provide new insights and routes for study of the disease and potential new therapies. Several of the novel genes identified are credible targets for drug discovery, repurposing and/or repositioning. Using the disease signatures identified as genetic biomarkers in trials of candidates drugs targeting specific mechanisms will enable precision medicine-based approaches. We hope this will encourage new targeted therapy discovery efforts.

Endometriosis↗