Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3298195

Relationship between ozone exposure and pulmonary function changes.

Abstract

A detailed comparison of literature-reported averaged decrements in pulmonary function of normal subjects exposed to O3 has been undertaken. The data base was formed by including data published during the past 20 yr from studies that reported at least one of the pulmonary function variables (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 s, mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity, and airway resistance) acquired at 2 h of exposures utilizing either original or modified Bates-Hazucha (intermittent exercise) protocol and that satisfied selection criteria. The final set of data (24 studies involving 299 subjects) was divided by ventilation rate (exercise loads) into four categories: light, moderate, high, and very high ventilation level. For each pulmonary function variable and ventilation level a quadratic function has been fitted to the data using regression procedures. The curve parameter estimates have been computed, tabulated, and statistically evaluated. The slope (quadratic coefficient) for each variable within a group and almost all variables between groups were significantly different from zero and from each other at P less than or equal to 0.0001.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Hazucha. 1987. Relationship between ozone exposure and pulmonary function changes.. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1987.62.4.1671

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Expiratory flow limitation detected by forced oscillation and negative expiratory pressure.

The within-breath change in reactance (Delta(rs)) measured by forced oscillation technique (FOT) at 5 Hz reliably detects expiratory flow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study compared this approach to the standard negative expiratory pressure (NEP) method. In total, 21 COPD patients were studied by applying both techniques to the same breath and in 15 patients the measurements were repeated after bronchodilator. For each patient and condition five NEP tests were performed and independently scored by three operators unaware of the FOT results. In 180 tests, FOT classified 53.3% as flow limited. On average, the operators scored 27.6% of tests flow limited and 47.6% non-flow limited, but could not score 24.8%. The methods disagreed in 7.9% of cases; in 78% of these the NEP scores differed between operators. Bronchodilation reduced NEP and DeltaX(rs) scores, with only the latter achieving significance. Averaging the operators' NEP scores, a threshold between 24.6-30.8% of tidal volume being flow limited by NEP produced 94% agreement between methods. In conclusion, when negative expiratory pressure and forced oscillation technique were both available they showed good agreement. As forced oscillation technique is automatic and can measure multiple breaths over long periods, it is suitable for monitoring expiratory flow limitation continuously and identifying patients' breathing close to the onset of expiratory flow limitation, where intermittent sampling may be unrepresentative.

Forced Expiratory Flow Rates↗