Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3276126

Proarrhythmic events.

Abstract

Virtually all antiarrhythmic agents can, under certain circumstances, be arrhythmogenic. The expected therapeutic and potentially arrhythmogenic effects of these agents may be altered if there is (1) an increase or decrease in the serum concentration of the antiarrhythmic agent due to interaction with other drugs, renal or hepatic disease or altered pharmacokinetics; (2) an idiosyncratic reaction to the antiarrhythmic agent; (3) an alteration in serum potassium or magnesium concentration; (4) interaction between the antiarrhythmic agent and the autonomic nervous system or between the autonomic nervous system and the heart, or (5) alteration of myocardial performance and the peripheral vascular system by the antiarrhythmic agent. Because of the lack of uniform reporting of data, guidelines have been suggested to evaluate proarrhythmic events. Of 412 patients receiving 1,080 drug trials for treatment of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, proarrhythmic events occurred in 33 patients (8%) and 43 drug trials (4%). The proarrhythmic event occurred more often during treatment for sustained ventricular tachycardia than for ventricular fibrillation or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The initial step in treating a proarrhythmic event is to discontinue the offending drug. Further recommendations are based on the nature of the particular arrhythmia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D P Zipes. 1988-01-15. Proarrhythmic events.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)90743-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cost effectiveness of inpatient initiation of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias.

This study assessed the cost effectiveness of inpatient antiarrhythmic therapy initiation for supraventricular tachycardias using a metaanalysis of proarrhythmic risk and a decision analysis that compared inpatient to outpatient therapy initiation. A MEDLINE search of trials of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias was performed, and episodes of cardiac arrest, sudden or unexplained death, syncope, and sustained or unstable ventricular arrhythmias were recorded. A weighted average event rate, by sample size, was calculated and applied to a clinical decision model of therapy initiation in which patients were either hospitalized for 72 hours or treated as outpatients. Fifty-seven drug trials involving 2,822 patients met study criteria. Based on a 72-hour weighted average event rate of 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.2% to 1.2%), inpatient therapy initiation cost $19,231 per year of life saved for a 60-year-old patient with a normal life expectancy. Hospitalization remained cost effective when event rates and life expectancies were varied to model hypothetical clinical scenarios. For example, cost-effectiveness ratios for a 40-year-old without structural heart disease and a 60-year-old with structural heart disease were $37,510 and $33,310, respectively, per year of life saved. Thus, a 72-hour hospitalization for antiarrhythmic therapy initiation is cost effective for most patients with supraventricular tachycardias.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents

Effect of reproducibility of baseline arrhythmia induction on drug efficacy predictions and outcome in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial.

Spontaneous variability over time in the ease of induction of ventricular arrhythmias may mimic a drug effect and affect the predictive value of drug therapy guided by programmed stimulation. We assessed the effect of baseline reproducibility of arrhythmia induction on the incidence and accuracy of drug efficacy predictions in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial. Patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced twice during baseline electrophysiologic testing with the same stimulation technique, i.e., induced at the same pacing site with the same drive cycle length and number of extrastimuli, were identified from the ESVEM database. These patients with highly reproducible arrhythmia induction were compared to those with less reproducible arrhythmias. Of 473 randomized patients with reproducibility data, 313 (66%) had highly reproducible arrhythmias. In patients randomized to electrophysiologic testing, baseline arrhythmia reproducibility did not affect the incidence of drug efficacy predictions (70 of 157 [45%], drug efficacy predictions in patients with highly reproducible arrhythmias vs 34 of 79 [43%] with less reproducible arrhythmias, p = 0.890). Drug efficacy predictions obtained by electrophysiologic testing in patients with highly reproducible arrhythmias were not associated with decreases in arrhythmia recurrence (p = 0.202), all-cause mortality (p = 0.301), cardiac death (p = 0.358), or arrhythmic death (p = 0.307) compared to those with less reproducible arrhythmias. Analysis of patients with highly reproducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia led to similar results. In the ESVEM trial, most patients had highly reproducible arrhythmia induction during baseline electrophysiologic testing. Reproducibility of arrhythmia induction in the baseline state had no effect on the incidence or accuracy of drug efficacy predictions.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents