Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3227206

Focus groups--some suggestions.

Abstract

In this article, the use of focus groups in health information campaigns is discussed from a mass communication theory point of view. The authors argue that information campaigning to a large degree is suffering from a "we-know-best" type of professionalism, and that the defining of the audience, its perception of health related concepts and its needs is often done with a lack of sensitivity and empathy. Focus group discussions could be used to help the health campaigner to define relevant target groups and to test how concepts and messages are received, perceived, interpreted, understood and accepted. Focus groups can be used to help formulate concepts and arguments, to reveal counterarguments that are triggered by the campaign arguments, and to test whole information campaign units.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Palm, S Windahl. 1988. Focus groups--some suggestions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3227206/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tell it how it is.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Communication↗

The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification.

The TNM classification is a worldwide benchmark for reporting the extent of malignant disease and is a major prognostic factor in predicting the outcome of patients with cancer. The objectives for cancer staging were defined by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Committee almost 50 years ago and are still broadly applicable today. To keep pace with the modern demands of evidence-based practice, the UICC introduced a structured process for introducing changes to the TNM classification. The elements of the TNM process were determined to include the development of unambiguous criteria for the information and documentation required to consider changes in the classification, establishment of a well-defined process for the annual review of relevant literature, formation of site-specific expert panels, and the participation of experts from all over the world in the TNM review process. Communication between the oncology community and those involved in the TNM classification was established as being essential to the success of the process. The process, which was introduced in 2002, will be tested over the next 3-4 years and evaluated. In addition to the formal process, individual initiative, involvement by the national staging committees, and group consensus are required. Furthermore, increased involvement by the experts should improve the understanding and dissemination of the TNM classification.

Communication↗