PubMed · 308678
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Arap, A Cabianca, E G Abrão, F A Silva, G Menezes de Góes. 1978. [Cloacal exstrophy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/308678/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To determine the MRI patterns of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in normal fetuses and some GI tract abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective (1996-1998) and prospective (1999-2000) study of 48 fetal abdominal MRI scans was performed between 23 and 38 weeks of gestation. T1-weighted (T1-W) fast gradient-echo (Flash 2D) and T2-weighted (T2-W) HASTE sequences were obtained on a 1.5-T unit, in frontal and sagittal planes, after maternal premedication. Fresh meconium was also studied. RESULTS: Normal patterns (40 cases): the rectum was seen in all cases and exhibited meconium-like high signal on T1-W images and low signal on T2-W images. It was close to the bladder whatever the fetal gender with its cul-de-sac being at least 10 mm below the bladder neck. The large bowel had a same signal; the distal colon was demonstrated more frequently than the proximal colon. The small bowel was transiently hyperintense on TI-W images early in gestation and then hyperintense on T2-W images. Normal measurements were obtained. GI tract abnormalities (eight cases): cysts close to normal bowel ( n=2), atresias ( n=5; microcolon, dilated small bowel with abnormal signal, one with a meconium cyst) and a cloacal malformation with midgut malrotation ( n=1; abnormal liquid signal in the rectum separated from the bladder wall and colon located on the left side). CONCLUSIONS: MRI provided complete visualisation of the fetal GI tract, showed specific signal intensities, identified the level of an obstruction, detected a microcolon, and demonstrated communication between urinary and GI tracts. It shows great potential.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prenatal diagnosis in facilitating prenatal counselling and planning optimal perinatal care for persistent cloaca, a complex malformation with variable presentation and a difficult reconstructive challenge for the paediatric urologist and surgeon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prenatal records of six patients with a suspected prenatal diagnosis of cloacal anomaly, subsequently confirmed on delivery, were reviewed. All had serial prenatal ultrasonograms. Fetal medicine and paediatric surgical specialists were present for the scans and counselled the parents jointly. RESULTS: The diagnosis was made at 19-33 weeks of gestation; all fetuses had a cystic structure arising from the pelvis and bilateral hydronephrosis, with a poorly visualized fetal bladder in most. Other prenatal features included transient fetal ascites, oligohydramnios, ambiguous genitalia and growth retardation. Female karyotype was confirmed in all cases by amniocentesis. Diagnosis was aided in two patients by fetoscopy and in another by magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Cloacal anomalies can be diagnosed prenatally and should be considered in any female fetus presenting with bilateral hydronephrosis, a poorly visualized bladder and a cystic lesion arising from the pelvis. Prenatal diagnosis allows time for parental counselling and planning of the delivery at a centre equipped with neonatal intensive-care and paediatric surgical facilities.
AIM: To assess the diagnostic value of spinal ultrasound in cloacal exstrophy, a caudal malformation which is associated with spinal dysraphism, and to assess the prevalence of spinal dysraphism in cloacal exstrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten infants under 1 year old with cloacal exstrophy underwent spinal ultrasound at presentation. Three patients also had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Ultrasound and MRI images were reviewed and correlated. RESULTS: Nine of 10 patients had no external signs of spinal dysraphism. One patient had a clinically apparent myelomeningocele. Five of 10 patients (50%) had spinal dysraphism on ultrasound: there were two patients with a low cord, two with tethered cords and a lipoma, and one patient with tethering and a myelomeningocele. Thus, in four of these five patients spinal dysraphism was occult. In a small number of patients (n = 3) MRI was also performed-in these cases the MRI and ultrasound appearances correlated, however MRI was not performed in those patients in whom spinal ultrasound was normal. CONCLUSION: In three cases where spinal ultrasound detected occult dysraphism and MRI was performed, spinal ultrasound and MRI correlated. Advantages of spinal ultrasound include ease of examination, production of high quality multi-planar images and the facility for portable imaging at the bedside. Spinal ultrasound should be the first investigation in all babies with cloacal exstrophy to diagnose occult and non-occult spinal dysraphism.