Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 3050509

AAEE minimonograph #29: automatic quantitative electromyography.

L J Dorfman·K C McGill
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The present status of different computerized methods of automatic quantitative electromyography are reviewed. Interference pattern methods-turns analysis, spectral analysis-are efficient, but the results usually cannot be directly related to the physiological properties of the motor units. Integration analysis does not currently have a major role in diagnostic electromyography. Traditional measurement of single motor unit action potentials during weak contraction can be facilitated and made more objective with computer assistance, but only the lowest-threshold motor units in the muscle are amenable to study. A new class of methodologies under development permit the decomposition of interference patterns into their constituent motor unit action potentials for measurement of configurational and behavioral properties. Patient data from these various methods can be statistically compared with normative data bases available on-line in computerized electromyographs. Both quantitative and quantitative electromyography have applications in the neuromuscular electrodiagnostic examination.

Explore related subjects

ElectromyographyHumansMuscle ContractionNeuromuscular DiseasesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Dorfman, K C McGill. 1988. AAEE minimonograph #29: automatic quantitative electromyography.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880110803

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Modulation operated by the sympathetic nervous system on jaw reflexes and masticatory movement.

The sympathetic nervous system (SNS), that is activated under condition of physical, psychological and psychosocial stress, affects force production and fatigability of muscles by controlling both muscle blood flow and the intracellular contractile mechanism. In addition SNS may affect motor function by modulating afferent activity from muscle spindles that are highly concentrated in jaw-closing muscles. Possible implications of these actions on masticatory function and myofascial pain are discussed.

Electromyography↗
PubMed2007

Abnormal responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple system atrophy.

We studied the response of the motor cortex to brief trains of suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations (rTMS) in patients with the Parkinson-variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-P) and compared it to patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls. Eight subjects were studied in each group, and patients were matched for disease severity as assessed by Hoehn & Yahr stages. rTMS was delivered at rest and during low-level contractions in trains of 10 stimulations at 5 Hz, and stimulation intensity was set to result in an motor evoked potential (MEP) in the first dorsal interosseus muscle of 0.5 to 1.0 mV. In MSA-P, MEP amplitude at rest was already reduced after the second stimulus and remained so, while it did not change in PD and controls. During contraction, MEP size did not change during the train in any group. The silent period that followed the last stimulus was of similar duration as the first stimulus in MSA-P, but was increased in PD and controls. These findings indicate that abnormal inhibition occurs within the motor cortex in MSA-P, despite dopaminergic treatment and indicate differences in cortical dysfunction between MSA-P and PD. We suggest that these abnormalities reflect the motor cortex pathology found in MSA-P.

Electromyography↗