PubMed · 2975377
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Wilson. 1988. Injectable contraception.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2975377/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It has been evident for over 30 years that combined oral contraceptive pills (OCP) increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. Recently, it has been suggested that there is an interaction between combined OCPs and the factor V Leiden mutation with the result that the relative risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is higher than expected in women who have this heritable thrombophilic defect using combined oral contraceptive pills. In Caucasian populations, factor V Leiden is very prevalent, being present in between 3 and 7% of Europeans and white North Americans. The high prevalence of the defect and its apparent interaction with combined oral contraceptive pills has led to the suggestion that all women should be screened for factor V Leiden prior to commencing contraceptive pills. Although the relative risk of VTE is very significantly increased in factor V Leiden positive women using contraceptive pills, the absolute incidence of venous thrombotic events is low and fatal pulmonary embolism is rare. It would be extremely costly to screen all women for the factor V Leiden mutation and unlikely to be deemed cost-effective. Widespread screening would result in 3-7% of women being denied the most effective and acceptable form of contraception and may influence negotiations with life insurers. It is suggested that only selected women, i.e. those with a personal history of previous venous thromboembolism and those with a clear family history of VTE are offered screening for thrombophilic defects.
OBJECTIVE: To review selected data on the effectiveness, safety, cost and technical ease of intrauterine device (IUD) use compared with Norplant and surgical sterilization. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. RESULTS: IUDs are highly effective, safe and relatively inexpensive methods of contraception that may offer advantages for some women over other long-term methods, such as sterilization and Norplant. IUDs provide protection against pregnancy comparable to that provided by female sterilization, and they may be more effective than Norplant. IUDs have a long duration of effectiveness: the copper T 380A (TCu380A) is effective for at least 10 years, and the levonorgestrel (LNg) IUD appears to be effective for at least 7. Norplant is effective for only five years. Both types of IUD can disrupt menstrual bleeding patterns, although the patterns of bleeding are different. Copper IUDs often increase blood loss, whereas the LNg IUD, like Norplant, substantially reduces menstrual bleeding. The most important adverse outcome associated with IUD use is higher rates of pelvic inflammatory disease; careful attention to proper insertion techniques can reduce this risk substantially, and LNg IUDs may cause no increase in risk. IUDs, like both sterilization and Norplant, provide no protection against sexually transmitted disease. The TCu380A IUD is extremely cost-effective. There is as yet no public sector price for the LNg IUD, which has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and is not provided by family planning donor organizations. If it can be made available to the public sector at a price substantially less than its present market price, the LNg IUD would be a useful addition to the contraceptive armamentarium for developing countries. CONCLUSION: Providers, consumers and family planning program managers should begin to see IUDs as potential substitutes for both surgical sterilization and Norplant.