PubMed · 296639
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Rode. 1979. [Amalgam corrosion].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/296639/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Silica is an important natural component of ground and surface waters, and is sometimes added as an inhibitor to control "red water" problems caused by corroding iron pipes. However, the effect of silicates on many aspects of iron corrosion has never been assessed. Experiments with water containing 0.5, 10, 25 or 50mg/L of SiO(2) demonstrated a significant interplay between aqueous silica and iron corrosion. During this 4-month experiment, higher levels of silica caused more iron release to the water and decreased the size of suspended iron particles. The process of iron corrosion also changed aqueous silica concentrations; silica was released into the water from the cast iron during corrosion and was removed from the water by incorporation into the scale layer. Silica also affected the type of scale that formed on the iron coupons. Scale at the lower silica concentrations was fairly uniform and easy to remove from the coupons, while the scale from the high silica reactors was more dense, and was more difficult to remove. Scale from the high concentration silica reactor also developed tall tubercles, and hydrogen gas-containing bubbles were channeled to solution through these tubercles. Iron corrosion occurring via the evolution was significant under all experimental conditions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare in vitro, the galvanic corrosion behavior of Co-Cr alloys (R2000, R800), Ni-Cr (RCS), silver-palladium (Jelstar), Gold (Pontallor-4) and Ternary Ti (experimental Ter Ti) when coupled with endosseous Ti implant abutment material. Amalgam alloy and commercially pure Ti cylinders (SSTi) were coupled with endosseous Ti implants as negative and positive controls, respectively. METHODS: An EG&G Model 263 Scanning Potentiostat was used for this purpose. Specimens were prepared and fresh artificial saliva was used as an electrolyte solution. The experiment run time was 24h for each couple. The common potential, galvanic current and current integration during the last 6h were recorded for each couple. RESULTS: The results showed that the best couples were Ti/Pontallor-4, Ti/Ter Ti, Ti/R800 and Ti/Jelstar. The least acceptable couples were Ti/amalgam, SSTi/SSTi and Ti/R2000, while the Ti/RCS couple showed unstable galvanic corrosion behavior. SIGNIFICANCE: It is concluded that the following alloys can be used as suprastructure alloys with Ti implants: Pontallor-4, R800, Jelstar and Ter Ti. Although Ter Ti alloy is an experimental alloy, it showed good results, but cannot be used in the clinical field unless extensive investigations are carried out. The SSTi/SSTi couple showed unexpected galvanic corrosion behavior which needs further investigation.
It is well known that the osseointegration of the commercially pure titanium (c.p. Ti) dental implant is improved when the metal is shot blasted in order to increase its surface roughness. This roughness is colonised by bone, which improves implant fixation. However, shot blasting also changes the chemical composition of the implant surface because some shot particles remain adhered on the metal. The c.p. Ti surfaces shot blasted with different materials and sizes of shot particles were tested in order to determine their topographical features (surface roughness, real surface area and the percentage of surface covered by the adhered shot particles) and electrochemical behaviour (open circuit potential, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic polarisation). The results demonstrate that the increased surface area of the material because of the increasing surface roughness is not the only cause for differences found in the electrochemical behaviour and corrosion resistance of the blasted c.p. Ti. Among other possible causes, those differences may be attributed to the compressive residual surface stresses induced by shot blasting. All the materials tested have an adequate corrosion and electrochemical behaviour in terms of its possible use as dental implant material.