Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2960290

[Biventricular infarctions].

Abstract

Posterior biventricular myocardial infarctions are more frequent than anterior ones. Unipolar right and high abdominal leads are necessary for the diagnosis. These supplementary leads are dependable, can be repeated as many times as necessary and show the evolution from signs of injury to those of inactivable tissue (Q waves of 0.04 sec or more). This information on evolution increases the diagnostic value of the electrocardiogram since signs of an injury current can be observed in other conditions as well. The diagnosis of right ventricular infarction can be established even in the presence of RBBB, but the differential diagnosis with acute cor pulmonale must be established on clinical as well on laboratory basis. The signs of an inactivable zone of the free right ventricular wall are more frequently observed in posterior biventricular infarctions than in the anterior ones. In the latter, signs of subepicardial injury are more accentuated in right thoracic leads than in V2 and V3, which indicate anterior right ventricular involvement. The same signs are also observed in experimental studies. A review of medical literature concerning the prognosis and evolution of biventricular myocardial infarctions is presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G A Medrano, A de Micheli. [Biventricular infarctions].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2960290/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: In a retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the effect of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy on ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with advanced congestive heart failure. BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplantation, our knowledge regarding its effect on ventricular arrhythmias is currently limited to small series. Little is known about the prevalence, predictors, and clinical consequences of ventricular arrhythmias in LVAD recipients. METHODS: We reviewed the pre- and post-LVAD course of the last 100 consecutive adult patients to receive a HeartMate LVAD (Thoratec Laboratories Corp., Pleasanton, California) at our institution. All ventricular arrhythmias sustained for at least 30 s or requiring defibrillation were analyzed. All documented pre- and post-LVAD sustained ventricular arrhythmias were classified either as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF). RESULTS: Our population had an average age of 51 years, had predominately ischemic cardiomyopathy (63%), and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 20 +/- 10%. New-onset MVT was observed in 18 patients who did not have MVT before LVAD placement. After LVAD, new-onset MVT was 4.5 times more likely than elimination of previously present MVT (p = 0.001), whereas the effect of LVAD on incidence of PVT/VF was not significant. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, serum electrolyte abnormality was an independent predictor of post-LVAD ventricular arrhythmias. Preoperative MVT did not predict postoperative MVT. CONCLUSIONS: After LVAD placement, there is a significant rise in the incidence of de novo MVT. By contrast, the incidence of PVT/VF was unaffected by LVAD placement.

Electrocardiography↗