Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2915787

Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity.

Abstract

Evoked potentials are commonly used for intraoperative monitoring of neural tissue under surgical threat despite the lack of unequivocal evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing neural injury. This study retrospectively compares the auditory morbidity of posterior fossa microvascular decompressive surgery before and after the introduction of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). All patients underwent a similar operative procedure performed by a single surgeon. The two groups were comparable with regards to age, sex, and indications for surgery. In the nonmonitored group, auditory morbidity had not declined with increasing experience of the surgeon. Ten of 152 patients (6.6%) suffered a profound hearing loss in the nonmonitored group. In the monitored group, none of 70 patients suffered a profound hearing loss. We attribute this significant decline (p = 0.02) in morbidity to the introduction of intraoperative BAEPs. We believe this to be the first demonstration of a significant decrease in operative morbidity directly associated with the use of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Radtke, C W Erwin, R H Wilkins. 1989. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity.. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.39.2.187

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds.

The performance on a conversation-following task by 24 hearing-impaired persons was compared with that of 24 matched controls with normal hearing in the presence of three background noises: (a) speech-spectrum random noise, (b) a male voice, and (c) the male voice played in reverse. The subjects' task was to readjust the sound level of a female voice (signal), every time the signal voice was attenuated, to the subjective level at which it was just possible to understand what was being said. To assess the benefit of lipreading, half of the material was presented audiovisually and half auditorily only. It was predicted that background speech would have a greater masking effect than reversed speech, which would in turn have a lesser masking effect than random noise. It was predicted that hearing-impaired subjects would perform more poorly than the normal-hearing controls in a background of speech. The influence of lipreading was expected to be constant across groups and conditions. The results showed that the hearing-impaired subjects were equally affected by the three background noises and that normal-hearing persons were less affected by the background speech than by noise. The performance of the normal-hearing persons was superior to that of the hearing-impaired subjects. The prediction about lipreading was confirmed. The results were explained in terms of the reduced temporal resolution by the hearing-impaired subjects.

Audiometry