Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2893930

Another trial that failed.

C C Cook·T D Scannell·M S Lipsedge
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A double-blind comparison of clonidine and lofexidine in the management of the opioid withdrawal syndrome encountered several difficulties of a non-scientific nature which eventually forced termination of the trial. There were, for example, problems with research beds, self-discharges, staff attitudes, access to haematological monitoring, and worries about exposure to staff to human immunodeficiency virus. The trial collapsed when the manufacturers stopped making lofexidine on commercial grounds and the charitable foundation which was backing the trial withdrew its support. Some of the insecurities of medical research may have little to do with scientific merit.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical Trials as TopicClonidineDouble-Blind MethodHumansOpioid-Related DisordersRandom AllocationResearch Support as TopicSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeClinical TrialJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C Cook, T D Scannell, M S Lipsedge. 1988-03-05. Another trial that failed.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91309-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2007

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗