Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2872607

Scrapie: how much do we really understand?

Abstract

Biological studies have produced convincing evidence for different scrapie strains, some of which undergo mutation. This argues strongly in favour of the infectious scrapie agent having a genome. The length of incubation period is influenced by the strain of agent but is also under strict host control. In mice, this control is exerted by a gene called Sinc which affects the overall rate of agent replication in the CNS. After peripheral infection, invasion of the CNS from lymphoreticular sites of agent replication is a key step in pathogenesis. Evidence from one scrapie model indicates spread of infection along autonomic nerves to the thoracic spinal cord and then to other parts of the CNS. Other studies have shown that infection can spread in neurons. There are close relationships between the presence of replicating agent and the development of vacuolation, and also of cerebral amyloid when it occurs. We can, therefore, begin to understand the patterns of lesion development in the brain in terms of the targeting of infection and its replication at certain sites. Structures known as SAF (Scrapie Associated Fibrils) have been discovered in extracts of scrapie brain (but not uninfected brain) and a glycoprotein (PrP 27-30: SAF protein) is a major constituent of purified SAF. The glycoprotein is coded by a single gene which is present in several species and expressed in uninfected brain. The normal protein seems to be modified in scrapie infected brain so that it accumulates as SAF. The modified protein may also be deposited as extracellular amyloid because there appear to be common epitopes between SAF and scrapie amyloid. The biochemical nature of the scrapie agent remains in doubt and the association between infectivity and purified SAF may arise fortuitously from the fact that scrapie agent is 'sticky'.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Kimberlin. Scrapie: how much do we really understand?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1986.tb00046.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Counteracting effects of renal solutes on amyloid fibril formation by immunoglobulin light chains.

In primary (light chain-associated) amyloidosis, immunoglobulin light chains deposit as amyloid fibrils in vital organs, especially the kidney. Because the kidney contains high concentrations of urea that can destabilize light chains as well as solutes such as betaine and sorbitol that serve as protein stabilizers, we investigated the effects of these solutes on in vitro amyloid fibril formation and thermodynamic stability of light chains. Two recombinant light chain proteins, one amyloidogenic and the other nonamyloidogenic, were used as models. For both light chains, urea enhanced fibril formation by reducing the nucleation lag time and diminished protein thermodynamic stability. Conversely, betaine or sorbitol increased thermodynamic stability of the proteins and partially inhibited fibril formation. These solutes also counteracted urea-induced reduction in protein thermodynamic stability and accelerated fibril formation. Betaine was more effective than sorbitol. A model is presented to explain how the thermodynamic effects of the solutes on protein state equilibria can alter nucleation lag time and, hence, fibril formation kinetics. Our results provide evidence that renal solutes control thermodynamic and kinetic stability of light chains and thus may modulate amyloid fibril formation in the kidney.

Amyloid↗

Degradation of amylin by insulin-degrading enzyme.

A pathological feature of Type 2 diabetes is deposits in the pancreatic islets primarily composed of amylin (islet amyloid polypeptide). Although much attention has been paid to the expression and secretion of amylin, little is known about the enzymes involved in amylin turnover. Recent reports suggest that insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) may have specificity for amyloidogenic proteins, and therefore we sought to determine whether amylin is an IDE substrate. Amylin-degrading activity co-purified with IDE from rat muscle through several chromatographic steps. Metalloproteinase inhibitors inactivated amylin-degrading activity with a pattern consistent with the enzymatic properties of IDE, whereas inhibitors of acid and serine proteases, calpains, and the proteasome were ineffective. Amylin degradation was inhibited by insulin in a dose-dependent manner, whereas insulin degradation was inhibited by amylin. Other substrates of IDE such as atrial natriuretic peptide and glucagon also competitively inhibited amylin degradation. Radiolabeled amylin and insulin were both covalently cross-linked to a protein of 110 kDa, and the binding was competitively inhibited by either unlabeled insulin or amylin. Finally, a monoclonal anti-IDE antibody immunoprecipitated both insulin- and amylin-degrading activities. The data strongly suggest that IDE is an amylin-degrading enzyme and plays an important role in the clearance of amylin and the prevention of islet amyloid formation.

Amyloid↗

Laminin inhibition of beta-amyloid protein (Abeta) fibrillogenesis and identification of an Abeta binding site localized to the globular domain repeats on the laminin a chain.

beta-Amyloid protein (Abeta) is a major component of neuritic plaques and cerebrovascular amyloid deposits in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Inhibitors of Abeta fibrillogenesis are currently sought as potential future therapeutics for AD and related disorders. In the present study, the basement membrane protein laminin was found to bind Abeta 1-40 with a single dissociation constant, K(d) = 2.7 x 10(-9) M, and serve as a potent inhibitor of Abeta fibril formation. 25 microM of Abeta 1-40 was incubated at 37 degrees C for 1 week in the presence of 100 nM of laminin or other basement membrane components, including perlecan, type IV collagen, and fibronectin to determine their effects on Abeta fibril formation as evaluated by thioflavin T fluorometry. Of all the basement membrane components tested, laminin demonstrated the greatest inhibitory effect on Abeta-amyloid fibril formation, causing a ninefold inhibition at 1 and 3 days and a 21-fold inhibition at 1 week. The inhibitory effects of laminin on Abeta fibrillogenesis occurred in a dose-dependent manner and were still effective at lower concentrations. The inhibitory effects of laminin on Abeta 1-40 fibril formation was confirmed by negative stain electron microscopy, whereby laminin caused an almost complete inhibition of Abeta fibril formation and assembly by 3 days, resulting in the appearance of primarily amorphous nonfibrillar material. Laminin also caused partial disassembly of preformed Abeta-amyloid fibrils following 4 days of coincubation. Laminin was not effective as an inhibitor of islet amyloid polypeptide fibril formation, suggesting that laminin's amyloid inhibitory effects were Abeta-specific. To identify a potential Abeta-binding site(s) on laminin, laminin was first digested with V8, trypsin, or elastase. An Abeta-binding elastase digestion product of approximately 120-130 kDa was found. In addition, a approximately 55 kDa fragment derived from V8 and elastase-digested laminin interacted with biotinylated Abeta 1-40. Amino acid sequencing of the approximately 55 kDa fragment identified a conformationally dependent Abeta-binding site within laminin localized to the globular repeats on the laminin A chain. These studies demonstrate that laminin not only binds Abeta with relatively high affinity but is a potent inhibitor of Abeta-amyloid fibril formation. In addition, further identification of an Abeta-binding domain within the globular repeats on the laminin A chain may lead to the design of new therapeutics for the inhibition of Abeta fibrillogenesis.

Amyloid↗