Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2808075

Visual evoked potential augmenting-reducing.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Connolly, J H Gruzelier. 1989. Visual evoked potential augmenting-reducing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(89)90383-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The effects of luminance on FPL and VEP acuity in human infants.

Grating acuity was measured in 16-week-old human infants. Three measurement techniques were used: forced-choice preferential-looking (FPL), and two visual-evoked-potential (VEP) techniques. The stimuli were counterphase flickering sinewave gratings with a space-average luminance of -1.0 or 2.0 log cd/m2. Slightly different luminance-dependent changes occur between FPL and VEP acuities, suggesting that some factor influences the two methods differently as stimulus luminance varies. A comparison between FPL acuities and VEP acuities within infants suggests a quantitative relationship between techniques. Infant's acuity for sinewave gratings with a space-average luminance of -2.0, -1.0, 0.0, 1.0 and 2.0 log cd/m2 was also measured using a single VEP paradigm. The results are compared to the same measurements in adults and to infant and adult ideal observers. VEP acuity in this group of infants improves by about 0.5 log units between -2.0 and 0.0 log cd/m2 and remains asymptotic between 0.0 and 2.0 log cd/m2. This result suggests that luminance-dependent changes in infant acuity cannot be fully accounted for by immaturities in the optics and photoreceptor spacing and efficiency.

Evoked Potentials, Visual

An analysis of the VEP to luminance modulation and of its nonlinearity.

Identification of the VEP luminance modulation system was carried out using a relatively long pseudorandom binary m-sequence stimulus. The complete first order cross-correlation function provides a "fingerprint" of the nonlinearity in the time domain. Volterra kernel slices up to third order are recognized in the complete first order cross-correlation function. They all lie close to the major diagonal. Higher order kernel slices are not measurable. A cascade block model (sandwich model) analysis shows the nonlinearity to be an asymmetric rectification. Luminance increase causes a stronger response than does luminance decrease. The pre-filter gain function is low-pass. The post-filter gain function is band-pass tuned near 10 Hz. Coherency spectra are used to examine the channel structure of the system. Two channels operating near 8 and 15 Hz are easily identified. Another broad channel (or possibly multiple channels) is present above 30 Hz. In many subjects, the pseudorandom stimuli allow a complete system identification to be carried out in less than 82 sec.

Evoked Potentials, Visual