Full circle or forward.

Abstract

In the early 70s when a parent with abuse problems named Jolly K. sought help to stop her abusive behavior, there were no services for parents. Today, nearly two decades later, there has not been much improvement with regard to the provision of services for parents. Our belief is that the dichotomy which occurred early in the field's development between those who were for the child, and those (such as Parents Anonymous) who sought to provide services to parents and were presumed to be for the parent and implicitly against the child is largely responsible for an ever more punitive approach to the problem. The solution lies in shifting our focus away from the exclusive mandate to protect the child towards support for the family unit. Such a shift should include expanding the knowledge base of the field by the inclusion of information from fields such as alcoholism, spouse abuse, and eating disorders, as well as by advocating for services which support the family. Research into the part that neuro-chemistry plays in violence should also be undertaken. The impetus for change within the field cannot come from the child protective services (CPS) system, which, as a creature of the law, can only be reactive, not pro-active. Professionals working outside the CPS system must take responsibility for change if it is to occur.