Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2771593

Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues.

Abstract

The interpolation of stereoscopic depth given only sparse disparity information was investigated. The basic stimulus was a rectangle with zero disparity at one edge, and 20 or 30 min visual angle disparity at the other. The depth assigned to the ambiguous intervening locations was measured by means of a small briefly-flashed binocular comparison spot. For a stimulus consisting of a uniform rectangle presented on a background of random dots with zero disparity, interpolated depth was greater for a high mean contrast between rectangle and background than for a low mean contrast. Relative to a linear interpolation between the edges, a larger difference in edge disparity resulted in poorer depth interpolation. Depth interpolation based on rivalrous information was examined by filling the stimulus rectangle with narrow-band filtered noise which was uncorrelated between the two eyes. Four different passbands which were matched in apparent contrast were investigated. The results demonstrate that the rivalrous low-spatial-frequency content was resistant to interpolation; rivalrous high spatial frequencies did not interfere with depth interpolation. High-spatial-frequency stimuli yielded a percept similar to the uniform-field condition, whereas low-spatial-frequency stimuli lay in a depth plane near or even behind the background. In the latter case a transparent plane was perceived which was linearly interpolated between the two edges, and which floated above the rivalrous noise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S M Würger, M S Landy. 1989. Depth interpolation with sparse disparity cues.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p180039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗