Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2764085

Allocation and discrimination based on human odontometric data.

Abstract

This study contrasts the confidence with which individuals may be grouped and then re-allocated on the basis of odontometric data. These data are derived from the mesiodistal and buccolingual diameters of 202 Lengua Indians of Paraguay (100 males, 102 females), 125 Caucasoid schoolchildren (59 male, 66 female), and 206 Negroes (106 male, 100 female). Multivariate intergroup discrimination is effected by means of canonical and stepwise discriminant analysis, whilst allocation is evaluated by means of posterior and typicality probabilities. Bias is reduced by means of a jackknifing procedure. High levels of discriminatory confidence (each Wilk's Lambda, P less than 0.01) are matched by high percentage correct classification (Caucasoid, 67.4-75.0%; Negro, 71.0-77.3%; Amerindian, 65.2-78.1%). However, these results are not matched by allocatory procedures: only 21.7% of caucasoids, 21.4% of Negroes, and 28.8% of Amerindians could be re-allocated with probabilities in excess of 80%. It is concluded that while multivariate discriminant techniques may be usefully employed in the separation of different populations, individuals may not be assigned with the same degree of confidence, even with an a priori knowledge of their group membership.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Kieser, H T Groeneveld. 1989. Allocation and discrimination based on human odontometric data.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330790309

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗