Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 2711067

Monitoring data quality through comparisons between data systems.

Abstract

Since its creation in 1960, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) has placed a high value on the quality of the information and statistics collected and published by its data systems. An important component of a comprehensive data quality monitoring system for a statistical agency such as NCHS is the comparison of statistics between data systems. Between-data-systems comparisons are used to monitor the consistency and comparability of statistics across data systems and between NCHS data systems and outside sources of data. This paper focuses on between-data-systems comparisons and describes a number of methodological analyses that can be used to evaluate data quality. The methodological analyses presented include the evaluation of time trends, the estimation of survey method effects, the evaluation of response error, the measurement of definitional and concept effects, and the detection of inconsistencies between data systems. The paper concludes with a discussion of the complexities of the between-data-systems comparisons and an assessment of the net benefits from such comparisons.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J T Massey, K L Hoffman. 1989. Monitoring data quality through comparisons between data systems.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780080318

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗