PubMed · 2698146
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J G Verbalis. 1989. Hyponatraemia.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-351x(89)80013-8
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The barroreflex-mediated secretion of arginine vasopressin has been found to be defective in a variety of vasodilatory shock states, such as postcardiotomy shock, and administration of the hormone markedly improves vasomotor tone and blood pressure. The high incidence of vasodilatory shock in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation makes this population an ideal model in which to assess the risks and benefits of vasopressin. METHODS: The medical records of the 102 patients receiving LVADs at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center from January 1995 to August 1998 were reviewed. Fifty patients were eligible for study based on a history of arginine vasopressin administration in the operating room or intensive care unit within 24 hours of implantation. RESULTS: Despite LVAD implantation and the administration of vasopressors, patients were hypotensive with a mean arterial pressure less than 60 mm Hg. The administration of vasopressin (0.09+/-0.05 U/min) increased mean arterial pressure (58+/-13 to 75+/-14 mm Hg; p<0.001) while reducing norepinephrine administration (11.7+/-13 to 7.9+/-6.0 mcg/min; p = 0.023). There was no significant change in LVAD flow. The incidence of compromised regional perfusion was not different between LVAD patients who received vasopressin as compared to hemodynamically stable LVAD patients who did not receive vasopressin. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated vasopressin at low doses to be a safe and an effective vasopressor in 50 patients with postcardiotomy vasodilatory shock.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Impaired pressor function in cirrhosis may be specific to certain agonists and vascular territories. This investigation determined whether responses to arginine vasopressin (AVP) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were impaired in hepatic arteries from cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Cumulative concentration-response curves were produced for AVP (10(-11) to 3 x 10(-6) mol/L), 5-HT (10(-9) to 3 x 10(-5) mol/L), and potassium chloride (2.5 -120 mmol/L) in hepatic arteries from liver donors (noncirrhotic) and recipients (cirrhotic). The receptor stimulated by AVP was identified using a V(1)-receptor antagonist (d[CH(2)](5)Tyr[Me]AVP) and a selective V(2)-receptor agonist (desmopressin [DDAVP]). RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients had a high heart rate (98 +/- 4 beats/min) and cardiac output (9.87 +/- 0.51 L/min) but low peripheral vascular resistance (711 +/- 35 dyn. s/cm(5)). None of the arteries had a functional endothelium. Maximal contraction (but not sensitivity) to AVP was smaller (P = 0.0002) in hepatic arteries from recipients (34.03% +/- 3.42% KCl) than donors (60.69% +/- 5.56% KCl). 5-HT-mediated contraction was enhanced in recipient hepatic arteries (88.81% +/- 5.43% KCl vs. 71.63% +/- 4. 46% KCl; P = 0.01), but sensitivities were similar (P = 0.20). KCl-mediated contractions were similar (P = 0.87) in both groups. Arteries did not respond to DDAVP, but d(CH(2))(5)Tyr(Me)AVP produced a concentration-dependent rightward shift in the response to AVP. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a selective impairment of V(1) receptor-mediated contraction in denuded hepatic arteries from cirrhotic patients, suggesting an abnormality within the vascular smooth muscle.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.