Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2695218

Perfusion imaging.

Abstract

The term perfusion has varied connotations in different situations. The word perfusion comes from the Latin to pour or diffuse through or over. Myocardial perfusion depends on (a) coronary artery or vessel flow, and (b) myocardial or muscle flow. The factors which determine perfusion at rest and during stress in coronary vessels and within the myocardium are clearly related but not with a predictable linear relationship. In animals there is extensive literature concerning the regulation of coronary flow and perfusion obtained by many sophisticated methods. In contrast, the techniques that are applicable to humans are relatively crude. To date, the clinical data available suggests that the normal control of coronary flow in man and in dogs is fairly similar but that models of pathology in animals bear little relation to the compensatory changes found in the coronary circulation in man. Although the data available is limited and subject to many technical inaccuracies, this article is confined to the assessment of myocardial perfusion in clinical practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A C Tweddel, W Martin, I Hutton. 1989. Perfusion imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072373

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of oximetry error on the diagnostic value of the Qp/Qs ratio.

As a quantitative assessment of the magnitude of shunting, the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs) plays an important role not only in the oximetric diagnosis of intracardiac and great-vessel shunts but also in the treatment of the patient. However, the oxygen saturation measurements used to compute the Qp/Qs ratio contain errors due to physiological variability and measurement error of the oximeter used to analyze the blood samples. We have developed a mathematical model to describe the variability that oximetry errors contribute to the uncertainty in the Qp/Qs ratio. Using this model, we compute the probability of making an inappropriate recommendation regarding corrective surgery when a particular value of the ratio is the criterion for surgery, e.g. a Qp/Qs ratio >2. This report also contains a spreadsheet that readers can use to analyze their own oximetry data by computing confidence intervals for the Qp/Qs ratio. The results presented here support the following conclusions. First, because the Qp/Qs ratio is calculated from saturation measurements at four different sites, oximetry errors make the Qp/Qs ratio less effective at detecting the presence of a shunt than the conventional step-up method that depends on samples from only two sites. Second, although oximetry errors are equally likely to cause the calculated Qp/Qs ratio to overestimate the true Qp/Qs ratio as to underestimate it, the overestimations on average have greater magnitudes than the underestimations. Third, in comparison with an oximeter that has 2.5% measurement error, using an oximeter with 1% or less error greatly reduces the uncertainty in the Qp/Qs ratio and thus increases the probability of reaching the right decision regarding corrective surgery. Fourth, the variability in apparent Qp/Qs ratios is also greatly diminished by taking multiple blood samples from each of the four requisite sites and averaging them before calculating the Qp/Qs ratio. Although increasing the number of blood samples from each site can compensate for the error of an oximeter, this approach can be impractical, particularly if the oximeter error is 2.5% or greater.

Coronary Circulation