New developments in thrombolytic therapy.

D Collen; H K Gold

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2686261

New developments in thrombolytic therapy.

D Collen·H K Gold

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thrombotic complications of cardiovascular disease are a main cause of death and disability and, consequently, thrombolytic therapy with plasminogen activators could favorably influence the outcome of such life-threatening diseases as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Five thrombolytic agents are either available or under clinical investigation: streptokinase (SK), urokinase (UK), recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) and single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scu-PA, pro-urokinase). The first generation thrombolytic agents, SK (and probably also UK), are only moderately efficacious; rt-PA is a more effective and fibrin-specific thrombolytic than SK; APSAC has a thrombolytic efficacy and fibrin-specificity that is probably similar or somewhat superior to that of SK and can be administered by bolus injection; scu-PA is more fibrin-specific than UK but it is only in the early stage of clinical investigation. Reduction of infarct size, preservation of ventricular function and/or reduction in mortality has been observed with SK, rt-PA and APSAC, but comparative trials with mortality endpoints are not yet available. Intravenous SK recanalizes 40-45 percent of occluded coronary arteries in patients with AMI and reduces mortality by 25 percent. rt-PA produces both more rapid and more frequent (65-70 percent) reperfusion. The choice of agent for the treatment of AMI at present must be based on considerations of lower cost of streptokinase versus higher efficacy for coronary recanalization of rt-PA. All available thrombolytic agents suffer shortcomings, including submaximal efficacy, limited fibrin-specificity and bleeding side effects. New developments towards improved efficacy and fibrin-specificity include combinations of synergistic thrombolytic agents, mutants of t-PA or scu-PA, chimeric t-PA/scu-PA molecules, antibody-targeted thrombolytic agents, and/or combinations of fibrin-dissolving agents with anti-platelet strategies.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Trials as Topic Coronary Disease Drug Synergism Fibrinolytic Agents Humans Myocardial Infarction Platelet Aggregation Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Thrombolytic Therapy Clinical Trial Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D Collen, H K Gold. 1989. New developments in thrombolytic therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2686261/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2008

On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.

An important measure for comparison of accuracy between two diagnostic procedures is the difference in paired areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Non-parametric and maximum likelihood methods have been proposed for interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. However, these two methods are asymptotic procedures and their performance in finite sample sizes has not been thoroughly investigated. We propose to use the concept of generalized pivotal quantities (GPQs) to construct an exact confidence interval for the difference in paired areas under ROC curves. A simulation study is conducted to empirically investigate the probability coverage and expected length of the three methods for various combinations of sample sizes, values of the area under the ROC curve and correlations. Simulation results demonstrate that the exact confidence interval based on the concept of GPQs provides not only sufficient probability coverage but also reasonable expected length. Numerical examples using published data sets illustrate the proposed method.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2007

An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.

A difference in an outcome variable between the treatment groups in a trial does not necessarily mean that there is a difference in the number of patients who experience relevant improvement on that variable. When the relevant improvement corresponds with an outcome or change in outcome that exceeds a certain threshold, the outcome variable can be dichotomized. A responder is a patient whose outcome exceeds the threshold. Comparisons can be made between the number of responders in the two treatment groups using logistic regression, or some other method to evaluate binary outcomes. An important disadvantage of this approach is the loss of power. In general, it is more efficient to test the difference between the mean values. We developed a statistical test that compares response rates for a dichotomized variable. It requires that an estimate of the reliability of the outcome variable is available. Simulations showed that the test was valid and robust over a wide range of distributions and sample sizes. The power was greater than the power of a chi(2) test, which would enable substantial reduction in the sample size.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2007

Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.

There is no consensus on the approach to compute the power and sample size with logistic regression. Some authors use the likelihood ratio test; some use the test on proportions; some suggest various approximations to handle the multivariate case. We advocate the use of the Wald test since the Z-score is routinely used for statistical significance testing of regression coefficients. The null-variance formula became popular from early studies, which contradicts modern software, which utilizes the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), when the variance of the MLE is estimated at the MLE, not at the null. We derive general Wald-based power and sample size formulas for logistic regression and then apply them to binary exposure and confounder to obtain a closed-form expression. These formulas are applied to minimize the total sample size in a case-control study to achieve a given power by optimizing the ratio of controls to cases. Approximately, the optimal number of controls to cases is equal to the square root of the alternative odds ratio. Our sample size and power calculations can be carried out online at www.dartmouth.edu/ approximately eugened.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗