Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 2682939

[Visual object agnosia: current conceptions].

Abstract

Visual agnosia for objects is a difficulty in recognizing objects presented visually. This difficulty can not be explained by a mental deterioration, a disorder of attention or a lack of familiarity with the object. Two criteria are essential but disputed: the absence of visual sensory difficulty necessary for adequate perception; possible recognition of the object by another sensory modality. An object is characterized by a triple representation: formal, semantic, lexical. The clinical, cognitive, pathophysiological analysis lead to distinguish 3 types of visual agnosia. 1) Aperceptive visual agnosia: patients see badly with morphological errors; the disorder concerns visual informations processing that is a necessary condition for identifying the formal representation of the object; the lesions are bilateral and involve the occipito-temporal cortex. 2) Associative visual agnosia: patients can copy, are not aphasic, but give erroneous verbal responses; the disorder concerns the links between formal representations and semantic, lexical representations; the lesions are unilateral and involve the left gyrus angularis connections. 3) Asemantic visual agnosia: patients have lost the meanings of objects and words; the disorder concerns semantic representations; the lesions are bilateral and involve the temporo-limbic cortex.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Cambier, J L Signoret, F Bolgert. 1989. [Visual object agnosia: current conceptions].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2682939/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects.

Studies of brain-damaged patients have revealed the existence of a selective impairment of face processing, prosopagnosia, resulting from lesions at different loci in the occipital and temporal lobes. The lesions are often extensive, and it is unclear what functional aspects of face processing are normally served by the damaged areas, and whether they are uniquely devoted to the processing of faces. These issues are further addressed through a combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) study of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in normal subjects performing different tasks of face and object processing. The results indicate different patterns of cerebral activation depending on the requirements of the tasks within the processing of faces, as well as a clear dissociation of the neural substrates underlying face and object processing. These results are compared with radiological data from prosopagnosic patients, and are put in relation with the patterns of deficits observed in the patients as a function of the location of their lesions. Together, the findings offer new evidence regarding the functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing.

Agnosia